Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumAre we all on-board with the "group" vs "forum" issue?
I'd rather this were a forum so we could make our case to everyone not already on our side.
Listing it as a "group" seems as though we're just pre-emptively shutting down discussion we don't like.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It functions as it was intended. The large forums exist to "make the case". If people posting in here have questions, we are happy to answer them. The SOP gives the outline, and it is fairly broad.
TBF
(32,092 posts)we do that everyday in many forums. I feel like every time I respond to a thread in General Discussion (or on most other websites - even FB) I have to explain myself before I even get started. Here we are supposed to have a protected environment in which we can discuss at another level - not just explain why we are anti-capitalist. Frankly it is tiring.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)We can make our case to everyone in the other, more general, forums. And I do. This is for a little higher level discussion on theory, strategy, and tactics.
As to pre-emptively shutting down discussion, you're probably going to see less of that here than almost anywhere else AS LONG as you keep the discussion respectful and don't automatically discount socialist ideas.
mistertrickster
(7,062 posts)I can live with that . . .
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)No one will be making any "case" with the term "comrades". Too Leninistic wouldn't you say? How about Socialist Brother or something; or Fellow Progressives .. but not "comrade".
TBF
(32,092 posts)mistertrickster
(7,062 posts)Non-gender specific, non-classist . . .
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)No question there are demonized associations but the word is a good one.