Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 11:18 PM May 2016

day five with the new Nikon....

On Monday the D7200 body arrived, along with a Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 lens, a Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR lens, and a slew of filters, most of which haven't been on the camera yet. On Wednesday the Tokina 12-28mm f/4 lens arrived. I have to say, the 35mm Nikkor is lovely, but I think the Tokina 12-28mm is the one that will spend the most time on the camera. It's a great range for outdoors.

I think I'm going to love this camera. It's been so long since I've used an SLR that it was probably a blessing-- I didn't have to unlearn much. The last time I set an aperture it was with a lens ring with clicky little stops at the full stop positions. I'm still getting used to the controls-- hell, I'm still learning what some of them are. It is a very capable beast, although it still feels a bit big and clunky in my hands (but that seems to be an advantage on a tripod, where it feels solid and immovable).

Here are a few early shots. The whole gallery is here, but it's presently pretty small. I'll add some more photos as I get more practice with it. These were all shot in my backyard.











16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
day five with the new Nikon.... (Original Post) mike_c May 2016 OP
Nice! Solly Mack May 2016 #1
Nice stuff NV Whino May 2016 #2
it will take me a while to learn to use it... mike_c May 2016 #5
Check out YouTube NV Whino May 2016 #6
I lick my chops at the clarity of these Mira May 2016 #3
it's the light.... mike_c May 2016 #4
Very nice! mnhtnbb May 2016 #7
Great shots! Blue_In_AK May 2016 #8
I guess there must be a newer version of the Tokina I have Major Nikon May 2016 #9
it's a very nice lens.... mike_c May 2016 #10
I was just considering the Tokina 12-24mm Adsos Letter May 2016 #11
If you already have the 11-16, personally I wouldn't bother with the 12-24 Major Nikon May 2016 #12
I have three Nikon primes: 35mm f/1.8G, 50mm f/1.8G, and 85mm f/1.8G. Adsos Letter May 2016 #13
The 70-200mm f/2.8 is a great lens. ManiacJoe May 2016 #14
I have the 50mm f/1.8 as well Act_of_Reparation May 2016 #15
great photos! mike_c Jun 2016 #16

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
2. Nice stuff
Fri May 27, 2016, 11:41 PM
May 2016

Love the shed with the rose.

I have the D7000, and I'm pretty much in love with it. If I had the 7200, I'd probably sleep with it.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
3. I lick my chops at the clarity of these
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:58 AM
May 2016

and the eyes of that wonderful cat.
Congratulations - keep showing your work please.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
4. it's the light....
Sat May 28, 2016, 01:23 AM
May 2016

It's just so gorgeous.

I have to agree about Jeffri's eyes though. She is a lovely cat.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
9. I guess there must be a newer version of the Tokina I have
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:50 PM
May 2016

It's the 12-24/f4, and is one of my favorite lenses. About the only bad thing about it is its tendency for flare, which isn't uncommon for extreme wide angle lenses.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
10. it's a very nice lens....
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:16 PM
May 2016

Right now it's the lens that I leave on the body most of the time.

Nice photo!

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
11. I was just considering the Tokina 12-24mm
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:33 PM
May 2016

I have the Tokina 11-16mm and I love it (it has the same tendency for flare).

Still trying to decide between the 12-24mm and the
Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 G. The cost difference has me looking seriously at the Tokina.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
12. If you already have the 11-16, personally I wouldn't bother with the 12-24
Sun May 29, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

I have the Tamron 17-50/2.8 which I think pairs up quite well with the 12-24. It would pair up even better with the 11-16. So unless you already have a lens that's somewhere in the 17-50 range, that would be the next logical choice.

The Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 G is a very nice lens, but personally I wouldn't bother with it unless I had a FX camera and I found myself shooting at that particular focal length quite a bit. If you are shooting a lot of events close in, or perhaps a lot of architectural work, then this lens might make a lot of sense.

The default lenses I carry in my bag are the 12-24, 17-50, and my 55/2.8 AIS. If I plan on shooting in low light situations, I swap out the 55/2.8 with my 50/1.4 AIS. If I had a newer Nikon than my D7000, I would probably not ever use my 50/1.4. I really do love Nikon primes, but I just don't find myself using them all that much other than the 55/2.8. The other exception is my 135mm f/2 dc which I really love for portraits, but if I had bought my 70-200/2.8 first, I probably would never have gotten the 135, although it does work with my FM2 film camera where the 70-200 doesn't.

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
13. I have three Nikon primes: 35mm f/1.8G, 50mm f/1.8G, and 85mm f/1.8G.
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:17 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 30, 2016, 01:09 AM - Edit history (2)

Nothing expensive, but I really like all of these lenses. In fact, I want to thank you for the advice you gave me about the 35mm when I was thinking about buying it. It is a great lens (and inexpensive). I used it at a Oscar de la Renta exhibit at the de Young (difficult lighting, no flash allowed, no tripod/monopod, crowded/bumping, etc.) and was really happy with the results:

[url=https://flic.kr/p/HcDCNb][img][/img][/url]

[url=https://flic.kr/p/HvtEcY][img][/img][/url]

[url=https://flic.kr/p/HeQLkS][img][/img][/url]

The 85mm f/1.8 functions nicely as a portrait lens on the D7100.

The 70-200mm f/2.8 you have sure looks nice. I'd love to own it, but I think I need to improve my skills before I invest in one of those.

Thanks for the detailed reply.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
14. The 70-200mm f/2.8 is a great lens.
Mon May 30, 2016, 06:06 AM
May 2016

Great for portraits and low-light sports.
It is also large and heavy.

If you don't need the f/2.8 aperture, the new 70-200mm f/4 is a great lens: smaller, lighter, some say sharper, noticeably cheaper.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»day five with the new Nik...