Photography
Related: About this forumday five with the new Nikon....
On Monday the D7200 body arrived, along with a Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 lens, a Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR lens, and a slew of filters, most of which haven't been on the camera yet. On Wednesday the Tokina 12-28mm f/4 lens arrived. I have to say, the 35mm Nikkor is lovely, but I think the Tokina 12-28mm is the one that will spend the most time on the camera. It's a great range for outdoors.
I think I'm going to love this camera. It's been so long since I've used an SLR that it was probably a blessing-- I didn't have to unlearn much. The last time I set an aperture it was with a lens ring with clicky little stops at the full stop positions. I'm still getting used to the controls-- hell, I'm still learning what some of them are. It is a very capable beast, although it still feels a bit big and clunky in my hands (but that seems to be an advantage on a tripod, where it feels solid and immovable).
Here are a few early shots. The whole gallery is here, but it's presently pretty small. I'll add some more photos as I get more practice with it. These were all shot in my backyard.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Love the shed with the rose.
I have the D7000, and I'm pretty much in love with it. If I had the 7200, I'd probably sleep with it.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...but I've got to agree-- this is a fine camera.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)There are a lot of videos that will get you up to speed.
Mira
(22,380 posts)and the eyes of that wonderful cat.
Congratulations - keep showing your work please.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)It's just so gorgeous.
I have to agree about Jeffri's eyes though. She is a lovely cat.
mnhtnbb
(31,395 posts)It's so much fun to have a new toy.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It's the 12-24/f4, and is one of my favorite lenses. About the only bad thing about it is its tendency for flare, which isn't uncommon for extreme wide angle lenses.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Right now it's the lens that I leave on the body most of the time.
Nice photo!
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)I have the Tokina 11-16mm and I love it (it has the same tendency for flare).
Still trying to decide between the 12-24mm and the
Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 G. The cost difference has me looking seriously at the Tokina.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)I have the Tamron 17-50/2.8 which I think pairs up quite well with the 12-24. It would pair up even better with the 11-16. So unless you already have a lens that's somewhere in the 17-50 range, that would be the next logical choice.
The Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 G is a very nice lens, but personally I wouldn't bother with it unless I had a FX camera and I found myself shooting at that particular focal length quite a bit. If you are shooting a lot of events close in, or perhaps a lot of architectural work, then this lens might make a lot of sense.
The default lenses I carry in my bag are the 12-24, 17-50, and my 55/2.8 AIS. If I plan on shooting in low light situations, I swap out the 55/2.8 with my 50/1.4 AIS. If I had a newer Nikon than my D7000, I would probably not ever use my 50/1.4. I really do love Nikon primes, but I just don't find myself using them all that much other than the 55/2.8. The other exception is my 135mm f/2 dc which I really love for portraits, but if I had bought my 70-200/2.8 first, I probably would never have gotten the 135, although it does work with my FM2 film camera where the 70-200 doesn't.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Last edited Mon May 30, 2016, 01:09 AM - Edit history (2)
Nothing expensive, but I really like all of these lenses. In fact, I want to thank you for the advice you gave me about the 35mm when I was thinking about buying it. It is a great lens (and inexpensive). I used it at a Oscar de la Renta exhibit at the de Young (difficult lighting, no flash allowed, no tripod/monopod, crowded/bumping, etc.) and was really happy with the results:
[url=https://flic.kr/p/HcDCNb][img][/img][/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/HvtEcY][img][/img][/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/HeQLkS][img][/img][/url]
The 85mm f/1.8 functions nicely as a portrait lens on the D7100.
The 70-200mm f/2.8 you have sure looks nice. I'd love to own it, but I think I need to improve my skills before I invest in one of those.
Thanks for the detailed reply.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Great for portraits and low-light sports.
It is also large and heavy.
If you don't need the f/2.8 aperture, the new 70-200mm f/4 is a great lens: smaller, lighter, some say sharper, noticeably cheaper.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Beats the hell out of the 18-55 that came with my D3300.