Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 01:57 PM Jun 2012

California begins mapping future without nuclear power (xpost)

From LBN Saturday: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014150461

California begins mapping future without nuclear power

Source: Los Angeles Times

California energy officials are beginning to plan for the possibility of a long-term future without the San Onofre nuclear plant.

<snip>

That long-range planning process already involves dealing with the possible repercussions of climate change, a mandate to boost the state's use of renewable sources to 33% of the energy supply by 2020 and another mandate to phase out a process known as once-through cooling that uses ocean water to cool coastal power plants, which will probably take some other plants out of service.

<snip>

Berberich and other energy leaders gathered in Los Angeles for a meeting convened by the California Energy Commission on long-term plans for the state's grid. The shuttered Southern California nuclear plant loomed large over the discussions.

<snip>

California ISO officials said they are beginning to plan for the possibility that the plant will still be offline in the summer of 2013 and hope to have the work done by the end of July.

<snip>

Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/06/state-officials-no-san-onofre-plan-1.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California begins mapping future without nuclear power (xpost) (Original Post) bananas Jun 2012 OP
SHUT THEM DOWN! AndyTiedye Jul 2012 #1
How would Diablo Canyon contaminate San Francisco? NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #2
No, not facts! XemaSab Jul 2012 #3

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
1. SHUT THEM DOWN!
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 01:10 AM
Jul 2012

San Onofre is just a little ways upwind of San Diego and Los Angeles.
When the Big One hits, that's gonna go Fuku if it isn't shut down yet.
Same for Diablo Canyon.

Both have far more nuke waste on-site than Fukushima too.

Shut them down NOW and get the waste outa there while it is still possible.

If San Onofre goes, San Diego and Los Angles will have to be evacuated. Fast.
Over a most likely decimated highway system. How are they gonna do that?

Diablo Canyon could contaminate much of central and northern California,
including the entire San Francisco Bay area.

These plants are not built to withstand such powerful earthquakes,
nor can they be retrofitted to survive them reliably.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. How would Diablo Canyon contaminate San Francisco?
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 06:43 PM
Jul 2012

It's hundreds of miles to the South... Source: Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility: http://a4nr.org/?p=2036

Diablo Canyon:



San Onofre:



~~~

~~~

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California begins mapping...