Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:12 PM Apr 2016

Local religious group suing city to remove outdoor urinals at Dolores Park (SF)

Not The Onion!

Littering might be most people's biggest problem with Dolores Park, but one local religious group hates those new urinals so much that they're suing the city to get them removed.

In a civil complaint filed last Thursday by the San Francisco Chinese Christian Union, the urinals are called an "illegal and wasteful expenditure of public funds" as well as "offensive to the senses" and "grossly unseemly."

As the SF City Attorney notes in a very snarky press release, the San Francisco Chinese Christian Union has been identified as an "anti-LGBT hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

"If I had to predict the top 100 things in Dolores Park likely to offend these plaintiffs, I wouldn't have guessed that this would make the cut," City Attorney spokesman Matt Dorsey says in the release.


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Local religious group suing city to remove outdoor urinals at Dolores Park (SF) (Original Post) KamaAina Apr 2016 OP
It does seem a little exposed, petronius Apr 2016 #1
Not really. xfundy Apr 2016 #2
arguing the unrinals are not ADA-compliant is a hoot LastLiberal in PalmSprings Apr 2016 #4
Well... SoapBox Apr 2016 #3

petronius

(26,602 posts)
1. It does seem a little exposed,
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016


but at least it has a nice view!



The suit apparently claims that "...the pissoir is not compliant with plumbing codes, has no hand-washing amenities, is not wheelchair-accessible and discriminates against women because, well, it's a urinal." (SFGate Link)

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. The pissoir seems to me like a good idea, and I've seen/used them in other countries without concern, but this double-talking suit might have some sort of legal merit...

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
2. Not really.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:06 PM
Apr 2016

Guys stand directly infront of the screen, which curves. Apparently The only people who'd see a weenie there are specifically looking to see one.

4. arguing the unrinals are not ADA-compliant is a hoot
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 06:18 PM
Apr 2016

I'm surprised they don't argue the urinals violate the "all men are created equal" clause of the Declaration of Independence.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
3. Well...
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 03:07 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe as a guy, it's kind of a guy thing (no, not for all guys) but (TMI moment), I can pee anyplace if I gots to go!

Ahhh, memories...of the days as a kid and we had LOTS of property...peeing on trees or in the creek!

Hey, I warned ya, TMI!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Local religious group sui...