Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
1. Makes a heck of a lot more sense than out current mish mash.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 05:32 PM
Sep 2012

I'm in Los Altos and would have had a stop 4 blocks from me.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
2. I had no idea it was supposed to be so extensive - what a great system that would be!
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:12 PM
Sep 2012

Thanks for posting this...

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
3. That green line through the Diablo & San Ramon Valleys would be packed every day.
Sat Sep 15, 2012, 05:02 PM
Sep 2012

Right now the freeways (I-680 to I-580) are constantly jammed at rush hour. There's even an old railbed that could have been used for BART. It's now the Iron Horse Trail.

Auggie

(31,171 posts)
4. Think of the carbon
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 11:17 AM
Sep 2012

that would have been eliminated from this alone. Then multiply that by 25 other metro areas. We spent the money on a "cold war" instead.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
5. And the freedom
Sun Sep 16, 2012, 07:28 PM
Sep 2012

that I and hundreds of thousands of other disabled, non-driving people would have had.

Auggie

(31,171 posts)
7. Santa Clara apparently was the real problem
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 08:31 AM
Sep 2012

Their withdrawal created a domino-like effect ...

From wikipedia:

In addition to San Francisco, Alameda, and Contra Costa Counties, Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, and Marin County were initially intended to be part of the system.

Before construction started, Santa Clara County Supervisors opted out in 1957, preferring instead to build expressways. In 1961, San Mateo County supervisors voted to leave BART, saying their voters would be paying taxes to carry mainly Santa Clara County residents.[10] Although Marin County originally voted in favor of BART participation at the 88% level, the district-wide tax base was weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County. Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost.


Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit

Brother Buzz

(36,434 posts)
8. The bridge controversy was the straw that broke the camel's back, but it was totally doable
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 11:48 AM
Sep 2012

Marin was on board until it was undone by last-minute politics.

Marin County was asked to withdraw from the project because BART officials were concerned that Marin voters might scuttle the entire system in the face of conflicting studies about its feasibility. Two studies concluded the Golden Gate Bridge could support a lower deck carrying trains. But engineer hired by the Golden Gate Bridge District said the plan would not work. One historian suggests the district shopped around for an engineer who would cast a cloud over the plan. Bridge officials did not want a train on the famed span, in part because the train could cut into the district’s toll collections, said Louise Nelson Dyble, author of "Paying the Toll: Local Power, Regional Politics, and the Golden Gate Bridge."

Three decades later, a 1990 study concluded the bridge indeed could handle trains. By then, however, the cost of building such a system made it politically unfeasible.

Brother Buzz

(36,434 posts)
10. It was practically in my backyard
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 03:00 PM
Sep 2012

This was the gravel bed near my childhood home that BART would have used . The station would have been three blocks from my house. Note: you can't see it, but there is an electric 'third rail' beside the tracks that serviced the Northwestern Pacific electric train, a superb commuter system that served southern Marin County until 1941. Today, the rails are gone and it hosts a bicycle path. Would have, could have, should have.

Retrograde

(10,136 posts)
12. And now we're paying additional sales tax for the Santa Clara extension
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 02:55 AM
Sep 2012

which I don't expect to see built in my lifetime.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
13. They broke ground earlier this year
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 12:51 PM
Sep 2012

it's supposed to open in about five years.

You're not terminally ill, are you?

Retrograde

(10,136 posts)
11. It looks like it follows the current Caltrain route down the Peninsula
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 02:52 AM
Sep 2012

If BART had gone with standard gauge track maybe we could be there by now!

NBachers

(17,110 posts)
14. My god, I had no idea it was going to be this extensive- I'm a block from 24th and Mission
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:53 AM
Sep 2012

and BART is a great resource. I've used the airport extension twice in the last couple of months.

Los Gatos to Jennings - Sonoma -Napa - Brentwood - Fairfield

The traffic jams avoided

The population mobile together

What a lost opportunity.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
15. Tell me about it
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 09:27 PM
Sep 2012

you have an actual station. I have the imaginary Fruitdale station, near the bottom, which is now a VTA light rail station that only gets me within the immediate San Jose area.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Wouldn't you rather live ...