Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 09:24 AM Oct 2012

Prop. 32's real purpose is to cripple labor unions politically

SACRAMENTO — Proposition 32 is stark proof that often you can tell a ballot initiative by its cover.

---

Even a cursory look at Prop. 32 shows that it's about a covey of special interests from the right attacking a rival interest on the left, organized labor.

If backers had turned their initiative into an honest debate about curtailing labor muscle — specifically the influence of public employee unions — they would have deserved more serious consideration.

But by deciding to phony it up — crafting what they perceived to be the best marketing pitch based on public opinion surveys — they've created a laugher and an insult to the voters' intelligence.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-cap-prop32-20121018,0,6178583.column

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prop. 32's real purpose is to cripple labor unions politically (Original Post) bemildred Oct 2012 OP
Absolutely. It is a fraud. Already voted no on it and sent in my absentee ballot. still_one Oct 2012 #1
Du rec. Nt xchrom Oct 2012 #2
No on 32! KamaAina Oct 2012 #3
Yeah, that one's an easy No. Don't even need the voter guide to aid my understanding of it. Gormy Cuss Oct 2012 #4
Yep. I voted against it. I hope Cleita Oct 2012 #5
DU Has Add for voting Yes on 32 nwliberalkiwi Oct 2012 #6
Yes, DU admins clearly have a secret RW agenda pinboy3niner Oct 2012 #7
Good post... SoapBox Oct 2012 #8
NOOOOOO on 32. SoapBox Oct 2012 #9
+99% pinboy3niner Oct 2012 #10
the first ad I heard for it was "Teacher unions protecting pedophiles" Johonny Oct 2012 #11

nwliberalkiwi

(367 posts)
6. DU Has Add for voting Yes on 32
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 05:02 AM
Oct 2012

WTF is Du up to?!!! They're stabbing us in the back running these rightwing adds. Who at DU made the decision to accept money from the rightwing? Traitors!!!

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
7. Yes, DU admins clearly have a secret RW agenda
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 07:57 AM
Oct 2012


DU doesn't choose the ads--they're supplied by Google Adsense based on keywords.

For contributing ('Star') DU members the ads are blocked. Kick in a small contribution and you won't see the ads.

Johonny

(20,851 posts)
11. the first ad I heard for it was "Teacher unions protecting pedophiles"
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:40 AM
Oct 2012

Yah that's the number one priority of unions... I knew instantly it was a pile of shit. I hate the prop system.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Prop. 32's real purpose i...