[quote]
No one argues that stiffer fines and penalties for human traffickers aren't warranted. Unfortunately, the devil is in the details of this ballot measure. Ambiguous language and broad definitions would set up dangerous legal challenges to the rights of both victims and suspects, while at the same time putting burdensome new requirements on local law enforcement agencies that are already overwhelmed with tracking the state's 90,000-plus registered sex offenders. Consensual relationships between teenagers hovering just above and below the age of 18 could also fall into a legal gray area. Proposition 35 will likely pass, because its goal is noble, but the execution of the language leaves much to be desired.

[/quote]


Disclosing internet identities is also unenforceable. All someone would have to do is use a VPN to hide what they are doing. This why Alpha Crucis Radio urges Californians to vote no on propositions. This will burden law enforcement with someone the cannot possibly enforce, if someone is teach saavy enough.

Being that most VPN services do not keep logs, they will render this law useless and why Alpha Crucis Radio urges a NO vote on prop 35. It will never work.

Prop. 30: YES - Generates $6-9 billion for schools and services
Prop. 31: NO - Shifts checks and balances and erodes state laws that protect families and workers
Prop. 32: NO - Discriminates against labor union political speech
Prop. 34: YES - Replaces California's death penalty with life in prison without the possibility of parole
Prop. 35: NO - Misleads voters by increasing criminal penalties without reducing human trafficking
Prop. 36: YES - Restores the original intent of the Three Strikes law
Prop. 38: Neutral - Increases funding for low-income students
Prop. 39: YES - Closes corporate tax loophole to raise $1 billion each year
Prop. 40: YES - Upholds the State Senate district maps drawn by independent commission

http://www.aclu-sc.org/community/let-me-vote/?etname=Ballot+guide&etjid=511071

I'll be checking back here come Nov. 7...

a Yes on 31 planted in the middle of DU home page, WTF!

The pdf chart at the link is provided by the Courage Campaign:

http://courage.3cdn.net/dc70549415e8bf39a2_6cm6bhvzs.pdf

Where they take a position, These organizations recommend:

NO: 31, 32, 33, 38

YES: 30, 34, 35*, 36, 37, 39, 40

* Despite the Yes recommendation on 35, the Courage Campaign notes that there are constitutional concerns about this proposition:

*

Why the hell do I see an add on DU to vote YES on Prop 32. Have seen several adds for Repukes and Rightwingers on DU.
What the hell is up with the people at DU?!!!

You can donate to DU, and they will go away.

Or just use Ad Block.

Does anyone have a rec on this measure?

It is exactly what I came here to look for.

Happy voting!