Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:12 AM Dec 2013

How You'll Pick Your New California Exchange Plan

http://www.calhealth.net/Pick_California_Health_Plan_by_Provider_Network.htm

-- snip
The commoditization of health plans and specialization of networks

That's a mouthful but it fits. The new Exchange plan benefits are mandated at certain levels (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze, and Catastrophic) which we've discussed in detail across calhealth.net The rates are somewhat constricted by MLR requirements and in indeed, the preliminary rates are all pretty range bound as expected. As we discussed over a year ago, if the benefits are mandated and the rates are constrained by MLR and political pressure, where's the give? The doctors and hospitals. It's akin to squeezing a baloon and the only way it can go it towards reimbursement to providers.

Early volleys at provider reimbursement

We heard rumors during the summer of 2013 that letters were going out to doctors and hospitals from carriers with intent to reduce reimbursement sizably for the new Exchange plans. Essentially, the providers were going to take the hit for guaranteed issue and increased health risk. The doctors had two options...accept a much lower reimbursement for care or choose not to participate in the networks. Either way, there was going to be big changes in the California health insurance networks. So what did we find out yesterday?

Exclusive contracts and shrinking networks

On the Individual and Family market, the carriers are signing exclusive contracts with hospitals and hospital groups. For example, the UC's signed a contract with Anthem. Blue Shield signed with Sutter. Scripps...Shield. Sharp...Anthem. We don't have information yet on Health Net's approach. The new PPO and EPO networks will probably have 50% of the current PPO doctor networks and 75% of the current PPO hospitals. Different areas will have PPO while others will have EPO within a given carrier.

So what does this mean to California health insurance shoppers and members

Unless the choice of doctor and more importantly hospital doesn't matter to you (assuming there's an alternative in your area), come Jan 1st, 2014, you will likely choose a plan which contracts with your chosen hospital and doctor. The real question is how people without a subsidy will react to paying much more for health insurance and getting about 1/2 of the prior network to access. We're not looking forward to those calls.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. My monthly premium will be almost $900 lower with ACA compared to COBRA.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:18 AM
Dec 2013

California, same doctor and hospital.

Color me delighted.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
2. Mine is very reasonable but I don't get access to doctors as before
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:31 AM
Dec 2013

It's going to upset people as the article indicates when they realize that Doctors at UCLA are rejecting the EPO in many cases. I've been calling to find out.

Those who make I think 45,000 will have to pay those hefty rates for crappy insurance. Something had to give and it's at the point of the doctor who can decide if they will bother with you or not.

They don't want to be flooded with new patients or get 30% less.

Also, the Anthem EPO, only one worth it in my area, means that if I have to access a specialist outside of their network I'm S.O.L.

That bugs me massively having seen the difference it makes to have the specialist that one needs. Now that even the UCLA specialists that are the top doctors are bowing out we can see the problem.

We can't go back, it was utterly unaffordable and insane, but I was hoping for more and would be ultra pissed off if I didn't get any subsidy and had to pay so much for narrow networks.

This is how they implemented in LA -- maybe elsewhere it is a truly good deal.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
4. Let's hope that the rumors are true, and that California will request a waiver
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:53 AM
Dec 2013

from the DHHS so we can put California OneCare in to replace the PPACA in our State.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
5. What's that? I've never heard of California One Care
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:22 AM
Dec 2013

Sounds Single Payer ish.

I wonder how they would tackle having a million new Medicaid patients in Socal
and all the other new insurance members.

I bet if the doctors received the same rates as Medicare they'd go for it.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. My husband's platinum Molina Insurance plan includes our doctor and hospital
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 12:50 AM
Dec 2013

in their network. And we're in the San Bernardino County where doctors and hospitals accepting ACA policies are supposedly supposed to be scarce. I didn't have a problem.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
6. Is this an HMO or ?
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 01:24 AM
Dec 2013

I think it has to be easier in smaller cities. There are less services so they can't be so narrow.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
7. Yes, it's an HMO. There wasn't a platinum PPO so we went with the HMO.
Mon Dec 2, 2013, 02:53 AM
Dec 2013

The premium was $485, but with the subsidy it will only cost him $213.12 per month and covers almost everything.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»How You'll Pick Your New ...