Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,194 posts)
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 09:53 AM Apr 2012

Dodgers deal exposes Prop. 13 loophole

4-2-12 / Thomas D. Elias

Amid the euphoria that erupted in much of California when a group led by former basketball great Earvin "Magic" Johnson and financier Mark Walter spent more than $2 billion to buy the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team and its stadium last month, one question led to some consternation.

Why should Frank McCourt, the notoriously wasteful outgoing owner, remain associated with the team, holding a 50 percent interest in the 200-plus acres of asphalt parking around Dodger Stadium?

SNIP

The answer may have a lot to do with a loophole in Proposition 13, the landmark property tax limitation law passed as a 1978 initiative. That law sets the tax on any property, commercial or residential, at 1 percent of the latest sales price and allows for tax increases of no more than 2 percent per year.

SNIP

All through the negotiation, McCourt kept insisting he would keep control of (the parking lots) even while selling the team and ballpark. But the deal as publicly reported saw the Johnson/Walter team pay McCourt $150 million for half-ownership of the striped pavement. The new owners will control parking prices and policy and pocket all the proceeds. That essentially means the new people will be the actual owners. And yet, McCourt remains a de jure half-owner.

Read more: http://www.appeal-democrat.com/articles/percent-115068-mccourt-tax.html

Bottom line: By retaining McCourt as "half-owner" of the parking lots, Magic Johnson and Company will be saving about $2 million a year in property taxes. As the author points out, that's money that could be going to schools, senior centers, parks, etc.

Mystery solved.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dodgers deal exposes Prop. 13 loophole (Original Post) Auggie Apr 2012 OP
I hate rich people who rip off the rest of us ArcticFox Apr 2012 #1
Hey , they have to "maximize value" for the "shareholders". bemildred Apr 2012 #2
Prop 13 is a right wing trojan horse DBoon Apr 2012 #3
Correct. And lots of debt. nt bemildred Apr 2012 #4
Which xxqqqzme Apr 2012 #8
It's not an unintended "loophole," it was designed that way on purpose. David__77 Apr 2012 #5
Stop this now KamaAina Apr 2012 #6
This is just the tip of the iceberg KamaAina Apr 2012 #7

ArcticFox

(1,249 posts)
1. I hate rich people who rip off the rest of us
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 10:20 AM
Apr 2012

What's two million a year when you own the Dodgers, anyway?

That's like me paying $10 a year.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Hey , they have to "maximize value" for the "shareholders".
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 10:38 AM
Apr 2012

That is: themselves. It is their moral duty to be selfish and greedy, see?

DBoon

(22,399 posts)
3. Prop 13 is a right wing trojan horse
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 10:59 AM
Apr 2012

people thought they were voting to allow poor senior citizens to keep their homes.

What they got was crumbling infrastructure and billionaires with $2 million taxes savings.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
8. Which
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 01:23 PM
Apr 2012

opponents warned would happen if prop 13 was passed. The warnings of failing education and infrastructure were there but ignored!

David__77

(23,520 posts)
5. It's not an unintended "loophole," it was designed that way on purpose.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:56 PM
Apr 2012

And Californians voted for it, so they will have to vote against it to change it, if they so want.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
7. This is just the tip of the iceberg
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 07:39 PM
Apr 2012
When former state Sen. Martha Escutia, an East Los Angeles Democrat, first proposed closing the post-Proposition 13 loophole, the state's nonpartisan legislative analyst estimated the change could produce between $3 billion and $8 billion in new revenues. That's about as much as the projected take from the tax increase initiative now being pushed by Gov. Jerry Brown.

The writer from the right-wing paper up in the Sacramento Valley goes on to blame Dems for not doing this. So why don't they do it?
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Dodgers deal exposes Prop...