California
Related: About this forumKamaAina
(78,249 posts)Padilla is kind of corporate. I have read, however, that repuke Peterson is in the lead. And you know what happens in states with repuke SoS's. Got vote suppression? So assuming Padilla makes it to November, i intend to hold my nose and vote for him.
Why would blue CA elect a 'puke SOS???
I don't have teevee--did Peterson run a massive ad campaign? Cast a spell?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)No massive ad campaign. Some of it could be that he's the only (declared) repuke in the race (yeah, right, Dan Schnur, you're "decline to state" ), which could allow Padilla to prevail in the fall. And I haven't seen any polls since Leland Yee's fall from grace; I would imagine that would help Padilla make up some ground.
I was leaning Cressman.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)in November. His name alone is worth tons of votes.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I would hate to help split up the vote and allow a Republican to take office.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)the top two finishers today will take each other on in November.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I'm not sure I'm understanding that as well as I should. Without knowing the expected outcomes, isn't it possible that 2 republicans could end up on the ballot?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)but that would be highly unlikely, and I don't see it happening here (even if you count Schnur as a repuke ).
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)the question of my OP. I've heard and seen so little about this race that I guess I was over thinking it, applying old rules to new and vice versa. I really appreciate all your input. Thank you, again!
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)and probably one of the reasons Maldonado pushed for the change. OTOH, in the last election my assembly district had 2 Democrats on the November ballot.
diva77
(7,640 posts)I don't think there are any good choices. You can read some interesting thoughts from Brad Friedman regarding the candidates here:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10602
But Cressman seems the most malleable on those non-negotiables such as advocating against internet voting.
LoisB
(7,203 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)But this race was not particularly highlighted, some "endorsers" didn't endorse anyone, and Padilla has money and name recognition. He's a DINO as far as I'm concerned and has aspirations for higher office. Too bad - Cressman was the best choice - he's been actively working to undo Citizens United.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)Padilla way ahead. But what's amazing is how many people voted for Yee!
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)Akinyemi Agbede
(Party Preference: DEM)
16,340
0.8%
* Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown
(Party Preference: DEM)
1,073,845
55.4%
Richard William Aguirre
(Party Preference: REP)
17,382
0.9%
Andrew Blount
(Party Preference: REP)
49,587
2.6%
Glenn Champ
(Party Preference: REP)
40,937
2.1%
Tim Donnelly
(Party Preference: REP)
286,847
14.8%
Neel Kashkari
(Party Preference: REP)
340,421
17.6%
Alma Marie Winston
(Party Preference: REP)
24,277
1.3%
Luis J. Rodriguez
(Party Preference: GRN)
23,173
1.2%
Cindy L. Sheehan
(Party Preference: P&F)
22,661
1.2%
"Bo" Bogdan Ambrozewicz
(Party Preference: NPP)
6,835
0.4%
Janel Hyeshia Buycks
(Party Preference: NPP)
5,763
0.3%
Rakesh Kumar Christian
(Party Preference: NPP)
4,586
0.2%
Joe Leicht
(Party Preference: NPP)
4,449
0.2%
Brother Buzz
(36,423 posts)Sad, really, that he's garnering so many votes.
hunter
(38,311 posts)But that's probably a 10% that will vote Democratic.