Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,172 posts)
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 02:46 PM Oct 2014

California Democratic Party / 2014 Endorsements

Governor: Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown

Treasurer: John Chiang

Lieutenant Governor: Gavin Newsom

Secretary of State: Alex Padilla

Attorney General: Kamala D. Harris

Insurance Commissioner: Dave Jones

Controller: Betty Yee

Supt. of Public Instruction: Tom Torlakson

-------------------------------

Ballot Initiatives

Yes on Proposition 1
WATER QUALITY, SUPPLY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2014 (CALIFORNIA WATER BOND)

Yes on Proposition 2
STATE BUDGET. RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

Yes on Proposition 45
APPROVAL OF HEALTHCARE INSURANCE CHANGES. INITIATIVE

Neutral on Proposition 46
DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING OF DOCTORS. MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE. INITIATIVE

Yes on Proposition 47
CRIMINAL SENTENCES. MISDEMEANOR PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE

Yes on Proposition 48
INDIAN GAMING COMPACTS RFERENDUM

-------------------------------

More at the link: http://www.cadem.org/resources?id=0713

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)
1. Prop 46
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 06:29 PM
Oct 2014

3 YES votes in my household. Not a bad looking slate (not crazy about Padila), and they're all going to win big.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
2. 2 more yeses here.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 07:29 PM
Oct 2014

My hope is that malpractice rates would go down and overall healthcare costs would drop a bit.

roody

(10,849 posts)
4. I have not read it yet. I would not want
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 01:30 AM
Oct 2014

the voters to legislate drug testing for my profession.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
5. I have an open mind.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:00 AM
Oct 2014

I have had experience with two addicted doctors. After a while, I figured it out, but it took time. Does your profession have life and death power as directly as doctors?

Mz Pip

(27,445 posts)
8. That's how I feel
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 05:03 PM
Oct 2014

I'm not a big fan of this legislation by initiative process we have here in CA as it is.

SoonerShankle

(322 posts)
3. And if you live the LA County South Bay area:
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 10:02 PM
Oct 2014

The local democratic clubs support the following:

AD66: Al Muratsuchi
SD26: Sandra Fluke
CD33: Ted Lieu
CD 43: Maxine Waters

Yes on Torrance Bond Measures T & U

JoeJustice46

(2 posts)
6. Yes on P46 for Patient Safety and Accountability for Preventable Harm
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:32 AM
Oct 2014

A recent study in the Journal of Patient Safety up to 440,000 Americans die yearly as the result of medical negligence.

If a drunk driver crashed into you killing your child and you later discovered that a state law now blocks you from obtaining an attorney to take legal action against the driver wouldn't you be outraged? And if you later discovered that the driver did not have to stop at DUI checkpoints wouldn't you be further infuriated?

In 1975 malpractice insurance companies created a phony insurance crisis then backed the MICRA law that passed and capped non-economic "pain and suffering" damages to $250K without inflation adjustment. Except in a rare punitive damage award this is the only award that can be paid in a wrongful death malpractice case for nearly 20 million Californians who do not have any job income(children, retirees, disabled, unemployed, ect), search on "caps harm California" and "protectconsumerjustice org how micra came to be".

Attorneys will not take these cases because the MICRA law also limits the attorney award to about 30%(BPC 6146) or $75K of any maximum $250K award and attorney and medical expert costs in a malpractice case can quickly exceed $75K

The MICRA cap and low non-economic damage caps in other states have enabled malpractice insurance companies to earn billions in profits by eliminating their monetary liability in these cases. It's no wonder insurance companies have spent tens of millions to defeat Prop 46 which doesn't even eliminate the cap, only adjusts it for inflation.

California malpractice insurance companies profit an incredible 70 cents for every dollar collected in malpractice premiums which leaves plenty of room for an increase in malpractice payouts without a rate increase to doctors. 22 other states do not have a non-economic damage cap and medical insurance rates are not any higher in those states nor are there shortages of physicians in those states.

Since 1988, Prop 103 has regulated doctors malpractice insurance premiums and can not be increased unless justified to the Insurance Commissioner.

Prop 46 also includes testing doctors for drug and alcohol which is done in many other occupations such as in the transportation industry to increase safety.

And Prop 46 requires physicians to check the state's existing and secure DOJ CURES prescription drug database before prescribing narcotics and other addictive drugs to curb doctor-shopping drug abusers, to prevent over-dose deaths and to reduce harmful behavior, search on "prnewswire prop 46 requiring physicians to check statewide prescription drug database".

PLEASE VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 46 for Patient Safety and Patient Justice.

roody

(10,849 posts)
9. My union says No on 46, and my
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 09:03 AM
Oct 2014

respected legislator, Wesley Chesbro, says No on Water Bonds. I'm going no on water bonds because dams are not the answer. Commercial and domestic rainwater catchment should be no. 1. Greywater for irrigation should be no. 1.1.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
11. I would suggest everyone go to Yeson46.org and read why it was sponsored.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:41 PM
Oct 2014

If everyone is basing their decision on the endless onslaught of NO ads, that all contain the same hot button SCAREY words...then you need to read.

I am subject to random drug and alcohol testing in my job...I think it's a good thing and I would love to know that my healthcare providers are clean...not addicted to drugs or an alcoholic? Then ya got nothing to worry about.

Hell, even my 93 year old Mother gets pee tested every 2 years (because she takes Percocet).

p.s...3 yes votes in our home for 45 and 46...noting that the CA Dems are Yes on 45 and...neutral on 46!

nirvana555

(448 posts)
14. I went to a site that is the supposedly Official Democratic Endorsements and NO on 46.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 12:53 PM
Oct 2014

I had already decided to vote no anyway. Reading the posts here I can see it's, shall we say,
"controversial"

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
17. At cadem.org
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 12:12 AM
Oct 2014

The California Democratic Party...as official as it can get...

Yeas on 45

Neutral on 46

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
15. I'm voting yes on 46
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 03:49 PM
Oct 2014

If I have to take a drug test, then EVERYONE should. Especially for that kind of profession and money. They shouldn't be able to drink either.

Tumbulu

(6,278 posts)
19. But Nancy Pelosi said Prop 45 will damage Covered CA
Sun Nov 2, 2014, 04:44 PM
Nov 2014

so I am confused.

She is a pretty darn important Democrat.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California Democratic Par...