Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 12:11 PM Mar 2015

Voting at 16 in S.F.? Supervisor says the time has come (xpost from GD)

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Voting-at-16-in-S-F-Supervisor-says-the-time-6137855.php

Sixteen-year-olds can drive, work, pay taxes and be sentenced to life in prison. Now, some want the right to vote, too.

On Tuesday, San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos will attempt to make that happen by introducing a measure that would extend the right to vote to 16- and 17-year-olds.

Avalos and other supporters say it will encourage civic engagement among youths and instill in them lifelong voting habits at a time when turnout is low. Detractors call the measure foolhardy at best and at worst a political ploy by progressives to try and win more votes from young people, who tend to lean liberal in their voting.

“I have seen the power of young people to be able to make changes and positive contributions to their community, and it makes sense to give them the right to vote,” Avalos said.


As for those "detractors", well, h8rs gonna h8.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voting at 16 in S.F.? Supervisor says the time has come (xpost from GD) (Original Post) KamaAina Mar 2015 OP
Not a good idea. The brain is not fully developed at 16; No Vested Interest Mar 2015 #1
Don't know how many would really vote. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #2
Let's first concentrate on getting 18 year olds to vote more frequently Auggie Mar 2015 #3
Good idea! YvonneCa Mar 2015 #4
I would go farther. Downwinder Mar 2015 #5
Sorry. We disagree. I agree with... YvonneCa Mar 2015 #6
Then they should not appear in Court as an adult. Downwinder Mar 2015 #7
I do agree with that. It speaks to... YvonneCa Mar 2015 #8

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
1. Not a good idea. The brain is not fully developed at 16;
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 01:03 PM
Mar 2015

executive decision-making skills not developed.
Let them finish their education and then participate to the fullest extent, as an adult.

YvonneCa

(10,117 posts)
8. I do agree with that. It speaks to...
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 03:33 PM
Mar 2015

...reforming the legal/judicial system, though. As a teacher, protecting children is a priority for me. A sixteen year old is legally a child and should be protected.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Voting at 16 in S.F.? Sup...