Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumVoting at 16 in S.F.? Supervisor says the time has come (xpost from GD)
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Voting-at-16-in-S-F-Supervisor-says-the-time-6137855.phpSixteen-year-olds can drive, work, pay taxes and be sentenced to life in prison. Now, some want the right to vote, too.
On Tuesday, San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos will attempt to make that happen by introducing a measure that would extend the right to vote to 16- and 17-year-olds.
Avalos and other supporters say it will encourage civic engagement among youths and instill in them lifelong voting habits at a time when turnout is low. Detractors call the measure foolhardy at best and at worst a political ploy by progressives to try and win more votes from young people, who tend to lean liberal in their voting.
I have seen the power of young people to be able to make changes and positive contributions to their community, and it makes sense to give them the right to vote, Avalos said.
On Tuesday, San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos will attempt to make that happen by introducing a measure that would extend the right to vote to 16- and 17-year-olds.
Avalos and other supporters say it will encourage civic engagement among youths and instill in them lifelong voting habits at a time when turnout is low. Detractors call the measure foolhardy at best and at worst a political ploy by progressives to try and win more votes from young people, who tend to lean liberal in their voting.
I have seen the power of young people to be able to make changes and positive contributions to their community, and it makes sense to give them the right to vote, Avalos said.
As for those "detractors", well, h8rs gonna h8.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1376 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voting at 16 in S.F.? Supervisor says the time has come (xpost from GD) (Original Post)
KamaAina
Mar 2015
OP
No Vested Interest
(5,167 posts)1. Not a good idea. The brain is not fully developed at 16;
executive decision-making skills not developed.
Let them finish their education and then participate to the fullest extent, as an adult.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)2. Don't know how many would really vote.
But they should have the chance.
Auggie
(31,173 posts)3. Let's first concentrate on getting 18 year olds to vote more frequently
YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)4. Good idea!
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)5. I would go farther.
Anyone who can be charged in Court as an adult should be allowed to vote.
YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)6. Sorry. We disagree. I agree with...
...post #1 above. Brain development is not there yet.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)7. Then they should not appear in Court as an adult.
YvonneCa
(10,117 posts)8. I do agree with that. It speaks to...
...reforming the legal/judicial system, though. As a teacher, protecting children is a priority for me. A sixteen year old is legally a child and should be protected.