Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,107 posts)
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:34 PM Jul 2013

Wal-Mart says it will pull out of D.C. plans should city mandate ‘living wage.'

The world’s largest retailer delivered an ultimatum to District lawmakers Tuesday, telling them less than 24 hours before a decisive vote that at least three planned Wal-Marts will not open in the city should a super-minimum-wage proposal become law.

A team of Wal-Mart officials and lobbyists, including a high-level executive from the mega-retailer’s Arkansas headquarters, walked the halls of the John A. Wilson Building on Tuesday afternoon, delivering the news to D.C. Council members. . .

Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) called Wal-Mart’s move “immensely discouraging,” indicating that he may consider vetoing the bill while pondering whether to seek reelection.

The D.C. Council bill would require retailers with corporate sales of $1 billion or more and operating in spaces 75,000 square feet or larger to pay their employees no less than $12.50 an hour. The city’s minimum wage is $8.25.

While the bill would apply to some retailers — such as Home Depot, Costco and Macy’s — a grandfather period and an exception for those with unionized workforces made it clear that the bill targets Wal-Mart, which has said it would open six stores soon. . .

Wal-Mart’s decision echoes the retailer’s first incursion into an American urban center seven years ago, when the Chicago City Council passed a similar “living-wage” measure. The company indicated then that the bill would cause it to scale back or entirely scrap its plans to open several stores, Mayor Richard M. Daley vetoed the bill, and the council failed to override it. In March, New York raised its minimum wage only after a compromise offered tax subsidies to firms such as Wal-Mart that hire seasonal workers.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/wal-mart-says-it-will-pull-out-of-dc-plans-should-city-mandate-living-wage/2013/07/09/4fa7e710-e8d0-11e2-a301-ea5a8116d211_story.html




11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wal-Mart says it will pull out of D.C. plans should city mandate ‘living wage.' (Original Post) elleng Jul 2013 OP
I hope the council has the guts to stand its ground! No livable wage; snappyturtle Jul 2013 #1
Damn right. elleng Jul 2013 #2
I wish you were the Mayor too!! nt snappyturtle Jul 2013 #8
HAHAHA! elleng Jul 2013 #9
Walmart...in DC?? LibAsHell Jul 2013 #3
I assume they're in the suburbs. elleng Jul 2013 #4
We have them in the suburbs already. LibAsHell Jul 2013 #5
Yes, it is referring to the city, elleng Jul 2013 #6
May all cities, towns, and counties do the same. longship Jul 2013 #7
It passed! Now it's on Gray... Chathamization Jul 2013 #10
I'm concerned about Gray too, elleng Jul 2013 #11

LibAsHell

(180 posts)
3. Walmart...in DC??
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jul 2013

Sounds weird, first of all. And please, no. I live in this area. I can't even imagine walking through the city and seeing a god damned Walmart.

elleng

(131,107 posts)
4. I assume they're in the suburbs.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:49 PM
Jul 2013

Tho I am, I rarely shop, and never at Walmart.

DC needs viable retailers, I'm sure.

elleng

(131,107 posts)
6. Yes, it is referring to the city,
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jul 2013

but my point is that DC itself needs viable retailers, and too damn bad walfart is taking this inhumane position.

longship

(40,416 posts)
7. May all cities, towns, and counties do the same.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 10:17 PM
Jul 2013

No living wage? No WalMarts.


Better yet. Just no WalMarts!!!

Chathamization

(1,638 posts)
10. It passed! Now it's on Gray...
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 08:48 PM
Jul 2013

The worrying thing though is that Gray has been a big proponent of Walmart and has expressed his concerns about this bill. One good thing though is that it looks like Walmart overplayed its hand; even the council members that voted for the bill had to come out and say that Walmart shouldn't bully DC.

The breakdown of the vote is pretty interesting. Wells and Cheh, who are generally considered to be at the liberal end of the council, voted against it. Corporatists like Evans and party machine types like Bonds voted in favor of it.

It was good to see Grosso and McDuffie vote for it. They're both new and seem like they have potential. The two of them have also been working on public financing for elections, and I think Grosso is planning on introducing legislation to legalize marijuana.

elleng

(131,107 posts)
11. I'm concerned about Gray too,
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jul 2013

and did I hear something about CONGRESS having to approve it TOO??? After all, DC STILL is a mere TERRITORY! NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»District of Columbia»Wal-Mart says it will pul...