District of Columbia
Related: About this forumWal-Mart says it will pull out of D.C. plans should city mandate ‘living wage.'
The worlds largest retailer delivered an ultimatum to District lawmakers Tuesday, telling them less than 24 hours before a decisive vote that at least three planned Wal-Marts will not open in the city should a super-minimum-wage proposal become law.
A team of Wal-Mart officials and lobbyists, including a high-level executive from the mega-retailers Arkansas headquarters, walked the halls of the John A. Wilson Building on Tuesday afternoon, delivering the news to D.C. Council members. . .
Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) called Wal-Marts move immensely discouraging, indicating that he may consider vetoing the bill while pondering whether to seek reelection.
The D.C. Council bill would require retailers with corporate sales of $1 billion or more and operating in spaces 75,000 square feet or larger to pay their employees no less than $12.50 an hour. The citys minimum wage is $8.25.
While the bill would apply to some retailers such as Home Depot, Costco and Macys a grandfather period and an exception for those with unionized workforces made it clear that the bill targets Wal-Mart, which has said it would open six stores soon. . .
Wal-Marts decision echoes the retailers first incursion into an American urban center seven years ago, when the Chicago City Council passed a similar living-wage measure. The company indicated then that the bill would cause it to scale back or entirely scrap its plans to open several stores, Mayor Richard M. Daley vetoed the bill, and the council failed to override it. In March, New York raised its minimum wage only after a compromise offered tax subsidies to firms such as Wal-Mart that hire seasonal workers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/wal-mart-says-it-will-pull-out-of-dc-plans-should-city-mandate-living-wage/2013/07/09/4fa7e710-e8d0-11e2-a301-ea5a8116d211_story.html
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)no Walmart. period.
elleng
(131,107 posts)Wish I were DC resident now. And the MAYOR!
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)elleng
(131,107 posts)Never thought of that, snappy!
LibAsHell
(180 posts)Sounds weird, first of all. And please, no. I live in this area. I can't even imagine walking through the city and seeing a god damned Walmart.
elleng
(131,107 posts)Tho I am, I rarely shop, and never at Walmart.
DC needs viable retailers, I'm sure.
LibAsHell
(180 posts)I'm pretty sure this is referring specifically to the city.
elleng
(131,107 posts)but my point is that DC itself needs viable retailers, and too damn bad walfart is taking this inhumane position.
longship
(40,416 posts)No living wage? No WalMarts.
Better yet. Just no WalMarts!!!
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)The worrying thing though is that Gray has been a big proponent of Walmart and has expressed his concerns about this bill. One good thing though is that it looks like Walmart overplayed its hand; even the council members that voted for the bill had to come out and say that Walmart shouldn't bully DC.
The breakdown of the vote is pretty interesting. Wells and Cheh, who are generally considered to be at the liberal end of the council, voted against it. Corporatists like Evans and party machine types like Bonds voted in favor of it.
It was good to see Grosso and McDuffie vote for it. They're both new and seem like they have potential. The two of them have also been working on public financing for elections, and I think Grosso is planning on introducing legislation to legalize marijuana.
elleng
(131,107 posts)and did I hear something about CONGRESS having to approve it TOO??? After all, DC STILL is a mere TERRITORY! NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!