Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 11:42 AM Jan 2014

Gay Marriage Legal Challenge - Guv Says He should be dropped from case if Att Gen is not defendent

http://www.law.com/jsp/pa/PubArticlePA.jsp?id=1202635723393&kw=Free%20Corbett%20From%20Gay-Marriage%20Case%2C%20Lawyers%20Say&et=editorial&bu=The%20Legal%20Intelligencer&cn=20140103&src=EMC-Email&pt=AM%20Legal%20Alert&slreturn=20140003103355

A number of gay couples were issued PA. marriage licenses and married through the work of a Montgomery Co. official. The PA Dept. of Health then said the marriages were invalid. Some of the persons then sued the state claiming discrimination. They sued Corbett, the Sec. of Health and Attyn. Gen. Kane.

Kane refused to defend the law, citing the recent US Supreme Ct. case on discrimination against gay persons. Under State law, the AG is allowed to turn over defense of state laws to the Governor's office for many different reasons. The gay couples then sought to relieve Kane as a defendant. Corbett has now filed legal papers saying that if Kane is no longer a defendant, then he should also be removed from the case.

Of course, Corbett is the guy who picked the lawyers and funded them to fight the lawsuit.

Excerpt:

"The Corbett administration, represented by lawyers from Lamb McErlane, fired back, saying in a response filed this week, "Joint petitioners argue that a discontinuance of the action against the attorney general would not cause unreasonable inconvenience, vexation, harassment, expense or prejudice to the governor. This is completely untrue."

The lawyers for Gov. Tom Corbett, a Republican, argued that dismissing only Kane, who is a Democrat, "implies a motive to inconvenience, harass and/or prejudice the governor with no legitimate justification."



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gay Marriage Legal Challenge - Guv Says He should be dropped from case if Att Gen is not defendent (Original Post) JPZenger Jan 2014 OP
Interesting legal point, I'm sure. malthaussen Jan 2014 #1

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
1. Interesting legal point, I'm sure.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 12:22 PM
Jan 2014

Common sense might indicate that since the AG refuses to defend the law, she is essentially saying "I give in," and therefore need not be sued. So long as the governor continues to defend, he is responsible for any damages the Court might rule.

But that's common sense. God knows what the law says.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Gay Marriage Legal Challe...