Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,417 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:52 PM Feb 2012

Judge rules against Lamar County woman; Keystone XL may proceed with pipeline

A judge in Paris ruled Friday the Keystone XL Pipeline may proceed through the northernmost of 18 Texas counties on its route to the Texas Gulf Coast.

Lamar County Court at Law Judge Bill Harris granted pipeline maker TransCanada’s motion to dissolve a temporary restraining order that had been based on a landowner’s claim the project could harm Caddo Indian artifacts on her family farm.

A full trial that will include other objections by landowner Julia Trigg Crawford, including her concerns for water quality and public safety, is set for April 30.

Crawford had asked Friday for Harris to approve an injunction barring further pipeline activity until the trial concludes. The judge’s ruling gave TransCanada, whose lawyers argued was losing money every day the project stalled, a green light to proceed without waiting for the trial.

http://www.news-journal.com/news/local/judge-rules-against-lamar-county-woman-keystone-xl-may-proceed/article_ea3d67ac-5f36-11e1-ae0c-0019bb2963f4.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge rules against Lamar County woman; Keystone XL may proceed with pipeline (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2012 OP
Complete and utter bullshit from TransCanada. seeviewonder Feb 2012 #1
A foreign country can use eminent domain on US soil? The judges ruling Historic NY Feb 2012 #2
What! sonias Feb 2012 #3
A tragic blasphemy. northoftheborder Feb 2012 #4

seeviewonder

(461 posts)
1. Complete and utter bullshit from TransCanada.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:57 PM
Feb 2012

Not to mention the Texas judges in bed with the oil industry. How much of that oil will actually be available to the U.S.? All they want to do is export it to other places and raise our prices here at home. If they didn't plan on exporting most of it, why would they not try to build a refinery near the sand pits?

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
2. A foreign country can use eminent domain on US soil? The judges ruling
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:11 AM
Feb 2012

gives TransCanada, whose lawyers argued was losing money every day the project stalled, a green light to proceed without waiting for the trial.

northoftheborder

(7,574 posts)
4. A tragic blasphemy.
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 11:53 AM
Feb 2012

This ruling is blasphemous against individual property rights, the environment, anthropological history. How can this line be already being dug when it hasn't even gotten a permit to do so???????????


Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Judge rules against Lamar...