Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white cloud

(2,567 posts)
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:23 PM Mar 2012

Texas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight

Excellent article and it cover a lot of ground.


Julia Trigg Crawford's fight to prevent Keystone XL pipeline company, TransCanada, from seizing her property using eminent domain scored a big win late last Friday when an appellate court reinstated her temporary restraining order (TRO). However, the same court just vacated the TRO today. TransCanada called in some big guns from American law firm Fulbright & Jaworski to get it done.

Most Americans believe eminent domain is a power unique to government that should only be used rarely and only in a matter of public necessity, like for a road or school. So they’re incredulous to find out private companies can obtain this governmental power under certain circumstances, and one of them is for pipelines. However in Texas, that’s restricted to what’s called a ‘common carrier’ pipeline deemed a ‘public use’ as opposed to a private use.


Continue reading on Examiner.com Texas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight - San Antonio Transportation Policy | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/transportation-policy-in-san-antonio/texas-delivers-victory-for-property-rights-keystone-pipeline-fight#ixzz1ojf4pyYg

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight (Original Post) white cloud Mar 2012 OP
This is bigger than you realize. The Backlash Cometh Mar 2012 #1
Yep white cloud Mar 2012 #3
Probably why it got the attention from the right people. The Backlash Cometh Mar 2012 #4
I'm with most Americans on this one sonias Mar 2012 #2
The headline is just a tad misleading ashling Mar 2012 #5

The Backlash Cometh

(41,358 posts)
1. This is bigger than you realize.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:31 PM
Mar 2012

This maneuver of private corpos trying to use the power of government to take over little property owners is part of the trend we see today with these private-public partnerships.

I'm glad to see this win for the homeowner, and hope it translates to smaller homesteads.

The Backlash Cometh

(41,358 posts)
4. Probably why it got the attention from the right people.
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:53 PM
Mar 2012

Not so easy for a homeowner to do when the ones who are behind the hostile takeover are community leaders.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
2. I'm with most Americans on this one
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:32 PM
Mar 2012
Eminent domain should only be used rarely!

Most Americans believe eminent domain is a power unique to government that should only be used rarely and only in a matter of public necessity, like for a road or school. So they’re incredulous to find out private companies can obtain this governmental power under certain circumstances, and one of them is for pipelines. However in Texas, that’s restricted to what’s called a ‘common carrier’ pipeline deemed a ‘public use’ as opposed to a private use.


Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Texas delivers victory fo...