Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumTexas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight
Excellent article and it cover a lot of ground.Julia Trigg Crawford's fight to prevent Keystone XL pipeline company, TransCanada, from seizing her property using eminent domain scored a big win late last Friday when an appellate court reinstated her temporary restraining order (TRO). However, the same court just vacated the TRO today. TransCanada called in some big guns from American law firm Fulbright & Jaworski to get it done.
Most Americans believe eminent domain is a power unique to government that should only be used rarely and only in a matter of public necessity, like for a road or school. So theyre incredulous to find out private companies can obtain this governmental power under certain circumstances, and one of them is for pipelines. However in Texas, thats restricted to whats called a common carrier pipeline deemed a public use as opposed to a private use.
Continue reading on Examiner.com Texas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight - San Antonio Transportation Policy | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/transportation-policy-in-san-antonio/texas-delivers-victory-for-property-rights-keystone-pipeline-fight#ixzz1ojf4pyYg
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1436 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas delivers victory for property rights in Keystone pipeline fight (Original Post)
white cloud
Mar 2012
OP
The Backlash Cometh
(41,358 posts)1. This is bigger than you realize.
This maneuver of private corpos trying to use the power of government to take over little property owners is part of the trend we see today with these private-public partnerships.
I'm glad to see this win for the homeowner, and hope it translates to smaller homesteads.
white cloud
(2,567 posts)3. Yep
and this one is a foreign company trying to ram rod it product to china through texas tax free zone.
The Backlash Cometh
(41,358 posts)4. Probably why it got the attention from the right people.
Not so easy for a homeowner to do when the ones who are behind the hostile takeover are community leaders.
sonias
(18,063 posts)2. I'm with most Americans on this one
Eminent domain should only be used rarely!
Most Americans believe eminent domain is a power unique to government that should only be used rarely and only in a matter of public necessity, like for a road or school. So theyre incredulous to find out private companies can obtain this governmental power under certain circumstances, and one of them is for pipelines. However in Texas, thats restricted to whats called a common carrier pipeline deemed a public use as opposed to a private use.
ashling
(25,771 posts)5. The headline is just a tad misleading
As the court vacated the TRO.