Last edited Mon Nov 17, 2014, 08:49 AM - Edit history (1)

there are questions about the rights of someone suffering from a disease.

The salient question here would be if the disease is being successfully treated. Only if not would I consider not hiring.

But a person with an alcohol problem gets shunned with no job? Nah! Good for the Governor for giving this person perhaps one last try to get better and work.

to remain gainfully employed. However, this is not a situation where the person did not have a job. He was employed and then promoted into positions which required oversight of billions of taxpayer money fairly soon after his criminal offenses. While the newspaper article mentioned something about "treatment" there is no indication as to whether he was admitted into a rehabilitation program or if he is currently involved in a group such as AA. Considering the amount of stress involved with the positions that he is holding it does seem relevant to inquire as to whether this person is the best choice for the job.

I didn't realize the stress involved and no treatment is not a good sign either.

be surprised about the integrity of a man who hangs out at a ranch named after a racial epithet? I can't bring myself to type the disgusting term, but people can search it out if they really want to develop a hatred for the man.