Texas
Related: About this forumU.S. Supreme Court rules Texas lawmakers did not intentionally discriminate in drawing political map
Texas Tribune
Extinguishing the possibility that Texas could be placed back under federal electoral supervision, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday pushed aside claims that lawmakers intentionally discriminated against voters of color when they enacted the state's congressional and state House maps.
In a 5-4 vote, the high court upheld 10 of 11 congressional and state House districts that the maps challengers said intentionally undercut the voting power of Hispanic and black voters, oftentimes to keep white incumbents in office. The Supreme Court found that the evidence was "plainly insufficient" to prove that the 2013 Legislature acted in "bad faith when it enacted the districts.
The one exception was Fort Worth-based House District 90, which is occupied by Democratic state Rep. Ramon Romero and was deemed an impermissible racial gerrymander because lawmakers illegally used race as the predominant factor in deciding its boundaries.
The Supreme Courts ruling, which keeps all but one of the state's districts in place through the end of the decade, is a major blow to the maps challengers civil rights groups, voters of color and Democratic lawmakers who have been fighting the Republican-controlled Legislatures adjustment of district boundaries since 2011.
more:
https://www.texastribune.org/2018/06/25/us-supreme-ruling-court-texas-redistricting-case/
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)hang onto power.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)and common sense, thanks to the Supreme Court seat stolen by Mitch McConnell.
Raster
(20,998 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,977 posts)Wonder who that 5th vote WAS? 🙄
I KEEP seeing Shitler-in-chief speaking about a red wave coming this fall.
DOES he know something that we don't as Mid-terms approach?
DISTURBING to say the least.