Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,288 posts)
Sat Aug 18, 2018, 07:25 AM Aug 2018

Appeals court tosses 3 UT professors' lawsuit challenging campus carry

A federal appeals court has rejected three University of Texas professors’ claims that the state’s campus carry law and its implementation by the university violate their constitutional rights.

Jennifer Lynn Glass, Lisa Moore and Mia Carter argued that their First Amendment right to academic freedom has been violated because free speech is chilled in classrooms out of concern that someone might be carrying a concealed handgun.

They also contended that their Second Amendment rights have been infringed because firearm usage is not sufficiently “well-regulated.” And they said their right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment has been violated because UT lacks a rational basis for deciding where concealed carry is permitted.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected all those arguments Thursday, upholding the July 2017 dismissal of the case by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel of Austin.

Read more: https://www.mystatesman.com/news/local/appeals-court-tosses-professors-lawsuit-challenging-campus-carry/M6t6a26JvGKm9l7sDyQ2KM/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court tosses 3 UT professors' lawsuit challenging campus carry (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2018 OP
Not a surprise FBaggins Aug 2018 #1

FBaggins

(26,751 posts)
1. Not a surprise
Sat Aug 18, 2018, 08:02 AM
Aug 2018

Academic freedom is still not we’ll established as a constitutional right, so it’s tough to argue that the state has an obligation to provide an environment for it to occur.

The 2A argument is clever, but interpreting “well regulated” to mean that the people can’t bear arms in a given situation isn’t likely to get far in Texas:

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Appeals court tosses 3 UT...