Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
We’re No. 1: Texas leads states in global warming emissions
Texas Climate News 1/12/12
We’re No. 1: Texas leads states in global warming emissions
It should surprise no one who follows climate issues at all closely that new data released by federal officials on Wednesday showed Texas far surpasses other states in industrial emissions of global warming gases.
Earlier estimates had already put Texas at the top of state rankings for those emissions, which largely flow from the state’s many electric power plants, oil refineries and petrochemical facilities.
The data released this week by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, reflecting industry-reported emissions during 2010, were far more detailed, however, and easily accessible and sortable on an interactive map that the EPA placed online.
Texas had 673 facilities (about a tenth of the national total) that reported emitting a total of 294 million metric tons (MMT) of greenhouse gases (mainly carbon dioxide) in 2010, according to the EPA. Pennsylvania ranked second, with 129 MMT, and Florida third, with 125 MMT.
PA was second but we still spew twice as much CO2 as they do. We are the worst polluting state in the nation.
Not that the republican leaders of our state give a crap. They'll all eventually move somewhere else when they have finished running the state further into the ground.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
Texas Tribune 9/12/12
Greenhouse Gas Wars to Restart in Texas
The greenhouse gas wars are about to heat up again in Texas. Next month, a federal court hears oral arguments in lawsuits that Texas has filed to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency, which began regulating heat-trapping emissions a year ago.
The EPA is hardly backing down. On Wednesday, the agency released an easily searchable database of big greenhouse gas polluters across the nation, prompting Texas environmentalists to immediately list the largest polluters in the state. Topping the list is the 1970s-era Martin Lake coal plant (pictured) in the East Texas city of Tatum. In 2010 it emitted nearly 19 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, about 13 percent more than the runner-up, the W.A. Parish coal plant in Thompsons, southwest of Houston. In third place is the Monticello coal plant in Northeast Texas, which narrowly avoided a shutdown when a federal appeals court issued a last-minute stay to an EPA pollution rule last month.
"This will be the first time that this data is publicly available and will inform Americans about the heat-trapping greenhouse gases emitted in their communities," wrote Elena Craft, a health scientist with the Austin office of the Environmental Defense Fund, in a blog post. Power plant data has always been available, she said, but now industries like pulp and paper and landfills must also report it.
Texas is believed to be the largest greenhouse gas emitter of any state, according to David Bary, a regional spokesman for the EPA. That's largely because of the preponderance of refineries, power plants and other heavy industry in Texas, as well as Texans' driving habits and the sheer size of the state.
Living in some parts of Texas is like smoking a pack a day.
So I'm right there in that "smoking a pack a day" feeling with ya. And I never smoked. We are a testing lab in Texas for polluting industry. Or at least the country's waste dump.
Emphasis mine and this was from the Texas Climate story linked in the OP
Using the EPA’s interactive map to compile data, the Environment Texas advocacy group released a list of Texas’ seven industrial facilities that ranked among the top 50 nationwide reporting the most greenhouse-gas emissions.
They were Luminant’s Martin Lake power plant (No. 4 nationally) and Monticello power plant (No. 19), NRG’s W.A. Parish power plant (No. 11) and Limestone power plant (No. 26), the Sam Seymour plant owned by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) and city of Austin (No. 39), AEP SWEPCO’s Welsh power plant (No. 40), and ExxonMobil’s Baytown refinery (No. 45).
They were Luminant’s Martin Lake power plant (No. 4 nationally) and Monticello power plant (No. 19), NRG’s W.A. Parish power plant (No. 11) and Limestone power plant (No. 26), the Sam Seymour plant owned by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) and city of Austin (No. 39), AEP SWEPCO’s Welsh power plant (No. 40), and ExxonMobil’s Baytown refinery (No. 45).
But I think it was the Energy Department he wanted to kill, but I forget...
Commerce, Education and eh.... 
