A 100-vote error - exactly? And with the GOP's recent history of stealing elections?

That dog don't hunt.

As of noon today on the Commonwealth of Virginia's website a difference of 115 votes is shown which is 0.38%. A recount is allowed if the difference is 1% or less. Provisional ballots have not yet been counted. The canvasses and provisional ballots should be complete by Tuesday, 11/14.

Donte T. Tanner Democratic 14,988 49.73%
Timothy D. "Tim" Hugo Republican 15,103 50.11%

That seems to be where the discrepancy lies: the precincts reported their respective totals, and this new canvass is coughing up more Hugo votes than the precincts originally reported.

Tanner's people had better make sure the ballots are individually counted before this thing is certified.

Totals have changed in both directions and will again as provisional ballots are verified.

A recount occurs after the vote is certified, which will begin 11/20. All paper ballots will be recounted per Virginia law. This is so much better than when they just added up the totals from the electronic machines again.

This race will be recounted and the recount will be watched closely.

This has Siegelman-Riley written all over it. Beware Southern good ole boys claiming a "computer glitch."

I still have nightmares about 2001

That sounds highly suspicious. I guess its possible but the odds are already low that the votes called in by phones were wrong, on top of that it happens to be exactly 100.

Think Siegelman-Riley in Alabama, when the tabulator totals from one (heavily Republican) county were suddenly found to be "off" by 10,000 or so votes in Riley's favor - and by a teenage girl volunteer no less.

She and Judge Moore must have "met."