Virginia
Related: About this forumThe Secret History of World War II's Women Code Breakers
I've been meaning to post this story.
For the book, Mundy got hundreds of World War II documents declassified.
Kayla Randall
Nov 30, 2017 12 PM
The African-American code-breaking unit at Arlington Hall.
Courtesy of National Security Agency
In 1945, Jaenn Magdalene Coz wrote to her mother. ... Im in some kind of hush, hush business. Somewhere in Wash. D.C. If I say anything Ill get hung for sure. I guess I signed my life away. But I dont mind it. ... Coz had been a young librarian. Then suddenly she was one of a number of librarians who had been recruited to decipher unfiled smatterings of coded messages for the U.S. Navy during World War II. She had now become a code-breaking librarian.
These five short sentences in Cozs letter to her mother sharply captured the spirit and sentiment of thousands of women like her, code-breaking women who had done just the same in secretly signing their lives away without a pause. Their fathers and brothers, boyfriends and husbands, had gone off to fight on the front lines. But these womenmore than 10,000didnt sit at home and wait. When their country called, they answered and they fought, too.
Looking through archives, local journalist and author Liza Mundy came across Cozs writing. When she read those words, she felt the all-encompassing magic in them. Immediately, she knew theyd be the epigraph of the book she was working on, Code Girls: The Untold Story of the American Women Code Breakers of World War II.
Over the past several years, Mundy relentlessly combed through archival records for her book. She pored over data, documents, and all there was to be read about the code girls, drawing from three large collections produced by the Army and Navy during and after the war. Most of these collections had been classified for decades. Now, many of the documents are available at the National Archives at College Park.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....don't tell trump about them, he'll figure out a way to insult them, maybe start calling them Pocahontas.
japple
(9,834 posts)so important. They need to be seen, read, and passed along to the next generations.
Irish_Dem
(47,207 posts)Women stepped into jobs they had never done before and did them well.
You don't really see women getting any credit for this.
bucolic_frolic
(43,249 posts)I think the service records of last names beginning with F through Z. Something like that. Wonder if these people were actually part of the Navy - or more an intelligence branch like OSS.
Merchant marine took terrible losses in WWII.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,566 posts)....
Affected records
The losses to Federal military records collection included:
80% loss to records of U.S. Army personnel discharged November 1, 1912, to January 1, 1960
75% loss to records of U.S. Air Force personnel discharged September 25, 1947, to January 1, 1964, with names alphabetically after Hubbard, James E.
Some U.S. Army Reserve personnel who performed their initial active duty for training in the late 1950s but who received final discharge as late as 1964.
None of the records that were destroyed in the fire had duplicate copies made, nor had they been copied to microfilm. No index of these records was made prior to the fire, and millions of records were on loan to the Veterans Administration at the time of the fire. This made it difficult to precisely determine which records were lost.
Navy and Marine Corps records
On the morning of the National Archives Fire, a very small number of U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps records were out of their normal file area being worked on as active requests by employees of the National Archives and Records Administration who maintained their offices on the 6th floor of the building. When the NPRC fire began, these Navy and Marine Corps records were caught in the section of the building which experienced the most damage in the fire.
The exact number of Navy and Marine Corps records destroyed in the fire is unknown, since such records were being removed only for a few days while information was retrieved from the record and were not normally stored in the area of the building which experienced the fire. Estimates indicate that the number of affected records was no more than two to three dozen. Such records are considered "special cases", and no accounting could be made of which records were affected, so the present policy of NPRC is to state that there were no Navy and Marine Corps records destroyed in the fire and to treat these records as records that had been lost in ordinary circumstances.
The destroyed sixth floor of the NPRC also housed a security vault which contained high profile and notable records of U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel. Known as the "Sixth Floor Vault", confirmed destroyed records included the Navy file of Greek Prime Minister Andreas Papandreou as well as the record of Adolf Hitler's nephew William Patrick Hitler. The sixth floor security vault also held all the records of current NPRC employees who had their own Navy and Marine Corps records retired at the agency.
Damage and reconstruction
The 1973 fire destroyed the entire 6th floor of the National Personnel Records Center and greatly affected the 5th floor with water damage. As part of the reconstruction, the entire 6th floor was removed due to the extensive damage, resulting in the current structure now consisting of 5 floors. The rehabilitated building has firewalls to divide the large, open records storage areas. Smoke detection and sprinkler systems have also been added to prevent a repetition of the 1973 fire. Signs of the fire can still be seen today. A massive effort to restore destroyed service records began in 1974. In most cases where a military record has been presumed destroyed, NPRC is able to reconstruct basic service information, such as military date of entry, date of discharge, character of service, and final rank.
bucolic_frolic
(43,249 posts)Yes my relatives' records were destroyed, though I do have a copy of discharge papers issued prior to the fire.
I only know what was told to me orally, and a series of letters home that had postmarks.
That article kind of blurs the loss of records; WWII era Army and Army Air Force were the same, or at least that's what I was told, they separated some time after the war. So the 80% loss of Army records includes AAF, but they extend that date to 1960. Ambiguous.
I did get a relative's records from WWI, Navy, they were most revealing.