Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,023 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 08:26 PM Jan 2020

Expected closure of National Archives' Seattle office sparks backlash

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announced Monday it will close its Seattle facility, pending sale.

Officials say sale of the building on Sand Point Way will take up to 18 months and have requested to stay in Seattle for three years after. No immediate action will be taken to affect patrons seeking access to archives and records.

NARA's Seattle facility holds more than 56,000 cubic feet of records from federal agencies in Washington, Alaska, Oregon, and Idaho, according to NARA. It also holds a small number of records for a few agencies in Montana.

In response to the announcement, Washington State Sen. Maria Cantwell co-signed a letter of disapproval to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) officials, citing lack of communication with lawmakers and Native American tribes, who have documents important to sovereignty and history located at the Sand Point building.

According to Cantwell and others, including Rep. Pramila Jayapal, there was little justification of the NARA closure. They cite increased visitor numbers and the need for access to public records as reasons to keep the location open.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/expected-closure-of-national-archives-seattle-office-sparks-backlash/ar-BBZpO2Q?ocid=hplocalnews

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Expected closure of National Archives' Seattle office sparks backlash (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 OP
Downsizing the administrative state? Karadeniz Jan 2020 #1
Here's some additional coverage Mersky Jan 2020 #2

Mersky

(4,982 posts)
2. Here's some additional coverage
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 08:45 PM
Jan 2020
‘Terrible and disgusting’: Decision to close National Archives at Seattle a blow to tribes, historians in 4 states
Jan. 25, 2020 at 2:05 pm Updated Jan. 27, 2020 at 9:21 pm

For many, it seems like a betrayal.

The decision to pack up and move the National Archives at Seattle to Southern California and Kansas City, Missouri, has rattled those who have spent hours doing research in the mammoth facility.

A panel charged with looking at ways to trim federal properties deemed excess has recommended the 73-year-old building and its 10-acre site be sold. The U.S. Office of Management and the Budget (OMB) agreed and announced its decision late Friday that the facility should be closed.


-snip-

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/terrible-and-disgusting-decision-to-close-national-archives-at-seattle-a-blow-to-tribes-historians-in-4-states/

___
I’d like to know which developers are on the short list to bid for this. Is a disservice to the region and country.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Expected closure of Natio...