Court Upholds Ruling Against Washington Florist Who Refused To Serve Gay Couple
The Washington Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the state courts had not acted with religious animus when they held that a florist violated the states anti-discrimination law by refusing to sell flowers to a same-sex couple for their wedding.
In this latest decision, the high court upheld its 2017 opinion that found Barronelle Stutzman and her business, Arlenes Flowers, had unlawfully discriminated against Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed by denying them service on religious grounds in 2013.
We are thrilled that the Court has reaffirmed its ruling in our favor, Freed and Ingersoll said in a statement. Discrimination hurts, especially while planning what should be one of the happiest times of your life. We hope that this ruling will prevent what happened to us from happening to others.
Previously, the Washington Supreme Court had upheld the Benton County Superior Court in ruling that Stutzmans actions violated the states Consumer Protection Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination. Under these laws, a business that chooses to provide a service to couples of the opposite sex must provide that service equally to same-sex couples, prosecutors had argued.
Stutzman filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her case in 2017, but the countrys highest court kicked the case back to the Washington Supreme Court in June 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court, which had just ruled in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, directed the state court to reexamine the Arlenes Flowers case in light of that decision.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/court-upholds-ruling-against-washington-florist-who-refused-to-serve-gay-couple/ar-AACuVa1?li=BBnb7Kz