Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumWisconsin Supreme Court justices battle over recusing themselves
From the Isthmus
Last August, before the disclosures involving Gableman came to light, the New York Times ran a stinging editorial on Wisconsin's Supreme Court entitled "A Study of Judicial Dysfunction." It pegged Wisconsin as a place where "over-the-top campaigning, self-interested rulings, and a complete breakdown of courthouse collegiality and ethics is destroying trust in its Supreme Court."
The editorial zeroed in on the issue of recusal, where it said the Wisconsin court "showed astounding disregard for legal ethics and every litigant's right to impartial justice."
...
Under state statutes, recusal is required whenever "a judge determines that, for any reason, he or she cannot, or it appears he or she cannot, act in an impartial manner." The state Supreme Court has interpreted this to be an explicitly subjective standard, hinging on whether the judge believes he or she cannot be impartial.
Indeed, a court majority has opined that under no circumstance may these decisions be overturned by other justices. This has sparked sharp disagreements among a court known for its internal discord, which has in the past included Justice David Prosser calling Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson a "total bitch" and threatening to destroy her.
Lots more here about our State Supreme Court, AKA "Judicial Follies".
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1289 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin Supreme Court justices battle over recusing themselves (Original Post)
Scuba
Mar 2012
OP
I agree whole heartedly with this write up of lack of judicial ethics in our SSC...
midnight
Mar 2012
#1
midnight
(26,624 posts)1. I agree whole heartedly with this write up of lack of judicial ethics in our SSC...
But who is going to remove Gabelman,Ziegler, and Prosser?
http://dekerivers.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/annette-zielger-and-justice-in-wisconsin/
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)2. Roggensack is up for election next year
We should keep that in mind, starting now.
HelenWheels
(2,284 posts)3. Change court to liberal
If we could replace Roggensack with a liberal the court would go from conservative to liberal. Wouldn't that be great!!!!!