Wisconsin

riversedge

(70,242 posts) Fri Jun 12, 2015, 08:08 PM Jun 2015

Walker — urged the GOP to focus on fiscal and economic issues, rather than social ones,

naw--lets talk about your forced ultrasounds your degrading of voter's rights, your dissing of protestors. your bad record on the enviroment. etc etc

WALKER ON WINNING: POLITICO’s Alex Isenstadt reports from Deer Valley, Utah: “In an address to major donors gathered here, SCOTT WALKER — who has wrangled with some in the Republican Party’s evangelical wing — urged the GOP to focus on fiscal and economic issues, rather than social ones, in the 2016 election.” http://politi.co/1JOGQEr

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Walker — urged the GOP to focus on fiscal and economic issues, rather than social ones, (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2015 OP

When you are fiscally irresponsible how do you focus on that? onecaliberal Jun 2015 #1

Not a good idea, Walker ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #2

Walker sure is the opposite of Sanders. delrem Jun 2015 #3

onecaliberal

(32,864 posts)

1. When you are fiscally irresponsible how do you focus on that?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Fri Jun 12, 2015, 08:18 PM

Jun 2015

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

2. Not a good idea, Walker ...

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Fri Jun 12, 2015, 08:21 PM

Jun 2015

http://host.madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/interactive-data-job-growth-under-scott-walker/html_91c1d53c-86a3-11e2-8ee8-0019bb2963f4.html

delrem

(9,688 posts)

3. Walker sure is the opposite of Sanders.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Fri Jun 12, 2015, 08:35 PM

Jun 2015

That's for abso-so-so-lutely certain.

Of course Walker did focus on social issues, he destroyed labor and the left. That was his objective.
He's one scary mo-fo, and people who likewise pretend that there's some division, some contrariety, between "social and economic issues", are in general scary. They tend to be myopic ideologues.

Let's put that economic/social-issues dichotomy canard to rest, NOW!

Reply to this discussion