Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumWI Supreme Court Fires Scott Walker Prosecutor to Stave-Off SCOTUS Review
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2015/12/12986/Walker-JohnDoe-WisconsinSupremeCourt"The Court rewriting its decision and firing Schmitz might be viewed not only as the majority protecting their biggest financial supporters and Scott Walker, but also as an effort to protect themselves.
That's because the Court's four-justice majority was elected to the bench with at least $10 million in spending from precisely the same groups accused of coordinating with Walker, and precisely the same groups that were under investigation in the John Doe--namely, Wisconsin Club for Growth and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce.
By rescinding Schmitz' appointment as Special Prosecutor, it makes it much harder for him to challenge the justices' conflicts-of-interest before the U.S. Supreme Court."
"The Wisconsin Supreme Court's majority might have reason to be scared about the prospects of a U.S. Supreme Court appeal. In the 2009 Caperton v. Massey decision, the nation's highest Court held that constitutional Due Process requires that judges recuse themselves in cases like this one."
- See more at: http://www.prwatch.org/news/2015/12/12986/Walker-JohnDoe-WisconsinSupremeCourt#sthash.tFRYHmb7.dpuf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1907 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WI Supreme Court Fires Scott Walker Prosecutor to Stave-Off SCOTUS Review (Original Post)
midnight
Dec 2015
OP
midnight
(26,624 posts)1. This now means: Prosecutor Schmitz' would have to work on appeal for free.
postulater
(5,075 posts)2. I'll donate to that effort.
midnight
(26,624 posts)3. I wonder how much this prosecutor would need to get this job done?
postulater
(5,075 posts)5. Well, we could form a People's PAC.
We could all contribute as John Doe.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)4. what a bunch of slimey bastards
Scuba
(53,475 posts)6. It would be hard to overstate how corrupt our State's Supreme Court is.