Wisconsin

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts) Fri May 25, 2012, 08:55 AM May 2012

Journal Sentinal (which endorses Walker) rates Walkers job claims as MOSTLY FALSE

We’ve rated Mostly False Walker’s claim in the ad that 33,200 jobs have been added during his watch when you add the new 2011 figure to monthly numbers for 2012. While both sets of numbers are the most up to date, they are gathered differently and cannot be added in this manner, and they were presented without critical facts.

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2012/may/24/scott-walker/recall-battle-wisconsin-gov-scott-says-new-figures/

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Journal Sentinal (which endorses Walker) rates Walkers job claims as MOSTLY FALSE (Original Post) HereSince1628 May 2012 OP

95% of Walker's claims are false or mostly false SWTORFanatic May 2012 #1

The rest are 100% false. Scuba May 2012 #3

Kinda suggests that his jobs performance Jackpine Radical May 2012 #2

The Urinal/Sentinel has been whoring for Walker all along. I'm surprised they didn't back him here. Scuba May 2012 #4

After reading it milwaukeelib33 May 2012 #5

We'll find out. Scuba May 2012 #6

SWTORFanatic

(385 posts)

1. 95% of Walker's claims are false or mostly false

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Fri May 25, 2012, 09:05 AM

May 2012

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

3. The rest are 100% false.

Reply to SWTORFanatic (Reply #1)

Fri May 25, 2012, 09:42 AM

May 2012

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)

2. Kinda suggests that his jobs performance

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Fri May 25, 2012, 09:06 AM

May 2012

i$ not the real rea$on behind the endor$ement.

What do you think they $ee in the wea$el?

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

4. The Urinal/Sentinel has been whoring for Walker all along. I'm surprised they didn't back him here.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Fri May 25, 2012, 09:43 AM

May 2012

Oh wait, they're still endorsing him, aren't they?

milwaukeelib33

(140 posts)

5. After reading it

Reply to Scuba (Reply #4)

Fri May 25, 2012, 12:50 PM

May 2012

I got the sense that it wasn't so much an endorsement for Wanker as it was an anti-endorsement for the recall as a whole. Akin to saying bend over and take it for another 2 1/2 years, then if your not satisfied with the path of destruction left in his wake you can throw him out in 2014.

That is a position that worries me, as I think there are a sizable number of Dems and Indies that are against Walker, yet share that feeling and aren't going to participate in the recall.

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

6. We'll find out.

Reply to milwaukeelib33 (Reply #5)

Fri May 25, 2012, 01:02 PM

May 2012

Reply to this discussion