Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:22 AM Feb 2012

GAB doesn't want to publish recall signatures because of privacy issues....

What do you guys think about the safety concerns?




http://maciverinstitute.com/tag/governor-walker/

[Madison, Wisc…] The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board has not posted scanned copies of the Governor Walker recall petitions online despite promises to the citizens of Wisconsin that they would do so.

GAB staff delivered copies of the scans to the Governor’s campaign late last week. The campaign, with the assistance of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, began reviewing the petitions at satellite offices across the state this weekend.

Once they scanned documents, they were going to make them public, having issued an alert to all media earlier in the day. The revelation was the top of many radio broadcasts Monday.

Such a public disclosure would have allowed the volunteers at the independent VerifytheRecall.com to also begin their effort.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
1. Quite enough people have been threatened to justify that decision.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:24 AM
Feb 2012

Teh Wingers of Wisconsin have gone off the deep end.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,694 posts)
2. If you believe it's about safety concerns...
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:25 AM
Feb 2012

Boy, do I have some deals for you!

It's NOT about that.

They don't want people to see how many signatures there are. They really don't want people to realize just how very unpopular Walker is.

That's my take.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
4. You can never tell. But this bunch are pretty lawless. Violence over
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:40 AM
Feb 2012

a recall petition? Some of his gang are coming unglued.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
8. That doesn't make any sense.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 08:42 AM
Feb 2012

GAB has no dog in this fight. They didn't want to do the Walker campaign's job of verifying signatures, but a court decision forced them. They didn't want to post petitions online, but the AG and WisGOP forced them. The GOP wants them online as a bully tactic against those who signed and circulated. In addition, they can now task all their followers to try to strike signatures from the comfort of their living rooms.

HDPaulG

(241 posts)
3. The Wisconsin GAB has published the report online as of 1/31/2012
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:39 AM
Feb 2012

They ommitted the contact information but retained name and address.

HDPaulG

(241 posts)
6. Was an article in Wednesdays GOP Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 01:58 AM
Feb 2012

Kennedy, of the GAB, stated open records trump privacy for political purposes. The GOP Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel is soliciting readers to review the signatures and report back to them: http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/dataondemand/138133913.html

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
9. if you read the stupid idiot reader reports, you'll see
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 08:45 AM
Feb 2012

They are clueless.

Ugh, I hate the Journal more than ever.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
10. Thank you for the information.... I'm not a lawyer, and don't know if Kevin Kennedy is correct,
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 11:40 PM
Feb 2012

but this is going to get interesting....

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
7. Where's the Governor's call for his supporters to remain peaceful? Where's his condemnation...
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:57 AM
Feb 2012

... of threats or violence? Threatening to burn down the house of someone who signed is terrorism. Where is his condemnation of this behavior?


On another note, I would have loved to be the fly on the wall when Kennedy had to face his staff on this issue. He's a tool for the right-wing and is not to be trusted.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
11. I can only think of this article as an explanation for why there will be no condemnation-low I.Q.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 11:53 PM
Feb 2012


Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes.

The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists.

Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice, he told LiveScience.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/intelligence-study-links-prejudice_n_1237796.html?ref=mostpopular
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»GAB doesn't want to publi...