Wisconsin

a kennedy

(29,673 posts) Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:19 PM Oct 2013

Russ Feingold Group Jumps Into Fight To Defeat Scott Walker

WASHINGTON -- Former Sen. Russ Feingold's (D-Wis.) advocacy group Progressives United jumped into the Wisconsin gubernatorial race on Tuesday, endorsing Democrat Mary Burke despite apprehension about her candidacy from some liberals.

Progressives United polled its Wisconsin members last week about whether to back Burke, a member of the Madison school board. After hearing from more than 3,000 of its members, the group decided to endorse her.

"Wisconsin members of Progressives United want to support Mary Burke for governor now and begin the work to beat Scott Walker in 2014," wrote Progressives United Executive Director Cole Leystra in an email to members. "By a 75.2%-24.8% margin, thousands of progressives voted to start organizing right away, so Burke can build a grassroots organization early."

An endorsement was far from guaranteed, and backing from Feingold's group will provide Burke with not only grassroots support and fundraising dollars, but also progressive credibility. Burke is so far the only Democrat in the race to unseat Walker, a Republican, but others may jump in.

State labor leaders have so far remained largely silent on Burke's candidacy, and some progressives have been upset that the Democratic Party has seemed to discourage other candidates from running.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/russ-feingold-scott-walker_n_4142141.html

Not real happy about this, she's not the best candidate is she?? Great that his group is getting involved in the fight, just wish a better choice was available.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russ Feingold Group Jumps Into Fight To Defeat Scott Walker (Original Post) a kennedy Oct 2013 OP

She's not the best candidate, but she's the richest one. Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #1

She can't outspend the Kochs. Tate's out of his league. Scuba Oct 2013 #3

Actually, I think there might be a law of diminishing returns in campaign expenditures. Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #5

From what I see, it is a endless campaign on MKE airwaves CatholicEdHead Oct 2013 #10

I'm confused by this endorsement. Burke is a DINO. We need someone better. Scuba Oct 2013 #2

It does not make sense coming from Feingold supporters. undeterred Oct 2013 #12

Burke supports gay marriage, opposes voter ID riversedge Oct 2013 #4

Kinda disappointed in her stance on ACT 10 though. a kennedy Oct 2013 #6

Compare Sen. Kathleen Vinehout's take on Act 10 dragonlady Oct 2013 #7

+1 Scuba Oct 2013 #13

about time we heard from him. EC Oct 2013 #8

oh shit we are going to screw it up again aren't we dembotoz Oct 2013 #9

wtf? seriously? lutefisk Oct 2013 #11

Only give to Candidates Big Tent Oct 2013 #14

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)

1. She's not the best candidate, but she's the richest one.

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:28 PM

Oct 2013

I think Tate was drawn in by the promise of lucre. I've commented before that the Party Poobahs seem intent on ramming her down our throat. I think there are a lot of state businesses pissed off at various things Walker has done, but not pissed-off enough to support a real Democrat like Vinehout. They think they can pull in enough money to win with Burke, and they're maybe right. Ah, political reality in the post-Citizens United world…

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

3. She can't outspend the Kochs. Tate's out of his league.

Reply to Jackpine Radical (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:31 PM

Oct 2013

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)

5. Actually, I think there might be a law of diminishing returns in campaign expenditures.

Reply to Scuba (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:42 PM

Oct 2013

After you've bought up all the available air time, billboards, newspaper ads, blimps with message banners, etc., what are you gonna do with the rest of the money?

But the point remains that Burke can muster up more big bux, her own & those of other business types who would like to own a tame Democrat, than someone like Kathleen could ever dream of.

And yeah, Tate is out of his league. Has been, in fact, ever since he got too old for Little League. Nevertheless, he no doubt has consultant friends who could profit handsomely from a well-financed campaign, no matter its outcome.

CatholicEdHead

(9,740 posts)

10. From what I see, it is a endless campaign on MKE airwaves

Reply to Jackpine Radical (Reply #5)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 07:05 PM

Oct 2013

That special interest groups are always running some pro-Walker or pro-GOP ad on Milwaukee airwaves. Good luck finding any airtime, it sounds like 24/7 Democratic party bashing in that area.

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

2. I'm confused by this endorsement. Burke is a DINO. We need someone better.

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:30 PM

Oct 2013

undeterred

(34,658 posts)

12. It does not make sense coming from Feingold supporters.

Reply to Scuba (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:08 PM

Oct 2013

Maybe all the progressives were too busy watching football to read their email.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)

4. Burke supports gay marriage, opposes voter ID

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:31 PM

Oct 2013

I would like to see Vinehout enter the race.

Burke supports gay marriage, opposes voter ID - TODAY'S TMJ4 http://www.jrn.com/tmj4/news/Burke-supports-gay-marriage-opposes-voter-ID-228701601.html …

a kennedy

(29,673 posts)

6. Kinda disappointed in her stance on ACT 10 though.

Reply to riversedge (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 02:54 PM

Oct 2013

So far, Burke has refused to endorse the repeal of Act 10, Walker's collective bargaining law that sparked massive protests in Madison in 2011 and the failed recall election targeting the governor and Republican state legislators. this does not make me very happy.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)

7. Compare Sen. Kathleen Vinehout's take on Act 10

Reply to a kennedy (Reply #6)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 03:09 PM

Oct 2013

This is from an interview with a blogger:

As we were drawing our conversation to a close, Vinehout exclaimed, “Ask me about Act 10!” before I could even ask her about Act 10, the anti-public employee legislation that rescinded collective bargaining for public employees while also dramatically weakening public employee unions. Prompted to share her thoughts, Vinehout was unambiguous about Act 10, stating, “I despise Act 10; that’s why I went to Illinois,” referring to the time she spent in Illinois with 13 other Democratic State Senators in the aftermath of Gov. Walker “dropping the bomb” that was Act 10. Vinehout acknowledged that there were issues that needed to be addressed in regards to public employees in order to assist the state in getting its fiscal house in order, but Vinehout was clear that she believed – and still believes – that those issues could have been fixed through the collective bargaining process.

http://bloggingblue.com/2013/10/a-conversation-with-kathleen-vinehout/

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

13. +1

Reply to dragonlady (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:20 PM

Oct 2013

EC

(12,287 posts)

8. about time we heard from him.

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 04:23 PM

Oct 2013

I really don't know if Burke will be strong enough. She looks pretty wishy washy. I don't know anything more than her being in the family of Trek Bikes.

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)

9. oh shit we are going to screw it up again aren't we

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 05:02 PM

Oct 2013

lutefisk

(3,974 posts)

11. wtf? seriously?

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Wed Oct 23, 2013, 02:15 AM

Oct 2013

Not a good candidate. She is not going to win with Bjork advising her to be Walker-lite.

Her naive, or well thought out (either way), support of the right wing Madison Prep, along with her utterly vapid demeanor, counts her out for me.

Big Tent

(85 posts)

14. Only give to Candidates

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Thu Oct 24, 2013, 01:45 PM

Oct 2013

I only give to candidates because the outside organizations always are at odds with who I support in primaries or where I would spend money in a general election.

Reply to this discussion