Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sat Apr 13, 2013, 04:48 AM Apr 2013

Government rejects measles outbreak 'blame'

Claims the outbreak of measles in south Wales was down to Department of Health policy in the 1990s is "completely incorrect", the government has said.

Vaccination rates fell after Dr Andrew Wakefield's now discredited 1998 study linking the MMR jab and autism.

Dr Wakefield told the Independent he had called for a single measles vaccine instead of MMR but this was not heeded.

The Department of Health said its immunisation advice "has always kept the interests of patients paramount".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22132428

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Government rejects measles outbreak 'blame' (Original Post) dipsydoodle Apr 2013 OP
We have a good candidate for blame - the local paper. There was even a study done muriel_volestrangler Apr 2013 #1
Despite the rumpus when I posted the SV40 issue, dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #2
These anti-vax cranks really need to be held to the Yelling-"FIRE!"-in-a-theater legal standard. DRoseDARs Apr 2013 #3

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
1. We have a good candidate for blame - the local paper. There was even a study done
Sat Apr 13, 2013, 05:46 AM
Apr 2013
Impact of a local newspaper campaign on the uptake of the measles mumps and rubella vaccine

Since July 1997 a protracted campaign against the MMR vaccine has been run by the South Wales Evening Post (SWEP), an evening newspaper sold in parts of two Health Authority areas (Morgannwg and Dyfed Powys). We report an investigation into MMR uptake in that area of distribution and compared it with uptake in the rest of Wales.

Methods and results

In Wales COVER statistics for the 14 trusts that provide community services are published quarterly by the Welsh Unit of the Public Health Laboratory Service Communicable Diseases Surveillance Centre. The distribution area of the SWEP (Swansea, Neath, Port Talbot and Llanelli) matches the localities served by two of these trusts. Coverage for the quarter July to September 1998 was compared with the same quarter a year previously in both the distribution area of the SWEP and the rest of Wales.

Uptake declined by 13.6% (95% confidence intervals 10.9% to 16.2%) in the distribution area of the SWEP and by 2.4% (95% confidence intervals 1.4% to 5.5%) in the rest of Wales. Before the campaign, uptake was significantly higher in the distribution area of the paper compared with the rest of Wales (difference 1.7%, 95% confidence intervals 0.1% to 3.4%). After the start of the campaign, uptake was significantly lower in the distribution area of the paper compared with the rest of Wales (difference ?9.4%, 95% confidence intervals ?7.1% to ?11.7%)

http://jech.bmj.com/content/54/6/473.full


The current editor is implausibly saying it was all someone else's fault, like the parents whose panic he was just reflecting:

Last week BBC Today reported reported: "Health service officials claim that one of the main reasons Swansea is at the centre of the epidemic is because the local Evening Post ran a campaign raising concerns about the MMR vaccine in the late 90s."
...
Writing today Roberts said: "It is dangerous to judge this campaign outside of its time. The evidence of a link between the MMR and autism has since been discredited, but in 1997 that was not the case. There was genuine concern, even fear, among parents that they could be putting their children at risk.

"The Evening Post highlighted those concerns in its campaign. It gave those with worries about MMR a voice and, in keeping with the tradition of this paper, that voice was balanced by the views of those who supported the vaccine. And we weren't alone. This was a nationwide concern that generated headlines across the country. To put our coverage in context, a paper was published in the medical journal The Lancet in 1998 which presented evidence that autism disorders could be caused by the vaccine. This was later retracted, but not until 2010. It is clear that there were genuine concerns in the mid-90s about MMR and the Post gave them full and responsible coverage.

"Our campaign reflected the concerns of parents, it told their stories, it called for answers, it wanted clarity. What it did not do was tell people to avoid immunising their children against measles - or mumps, or rubella.

"It actually warned parents they had to ensure their children were protected. It said measles was not a disease to be taken lightly. What it did do was suggest people considered the options, sought medical advice, looked at the single jab alternative. And when health experts came out and defended the MMR jab as safe, the paper printed those stories too.

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/south-wales-post-editor-defends-title-against-charge-its-campaign-helped-fuel-measles-outbreak

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
2. Despite the rumpus when I posted the SV40 issue,
Sat Apr 13, 2013, 05:59 AM
Apr 2013

not helped by using a joke source originally ,I've always been pro vaccination - prevention is better than cure. On this particular subject, as far as I'm concerned , autism is inherited : you don't "catch it".

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
3. These anti-vax cranks really need to be held to the Yelling-"FIRE!"-in-a-theater legal standard.
Sat Apr 13, 2013, 07:48 AM
Apr 2013

They have pushed their dangerous nonsense for far too long and people - children, mostly - are dying because of it. They need to be thrown in jail, their ill-gotten assets gained through their lies seized, their networks spreading their lies dismantled. Free speech has its limits, and blatantly putting public heath and safety in danger would be that limit.

And I am so sick of these penny-ante, don't-hurt-anyone's-fee-fees public statements from government bodies. Call these cranks to the carpet by name. Strike their arguments down with clear blunt facts, not wishy-washy safe words and vague references to someone somewhere saying something. Call these people out for being liars, and putting lives in danger for it.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Government rejects measle...