Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 09:26 AM Dec 2013

European court is not superior to UK supreme court, says Lord Judge.

The law should be changed to make it clear that British courts are not obliged to implement judgments of the European court of human rights (ECHR), according to the former lord chief justice.

Declaring that Strasbourg "is not superior to our supreme court" in London, Lord Judge, who retired in October, said parliamentary sovereignty should not be exported to "a foreign court".

He is the third senior judicial figure in recent weeks to warn about the dangers of an emerging "democratic deficit" if the ECHR continues to evolve into in effect a law-making body and forces the UK government to give prisoners the vote against parliament's expressed will.

Last week Lord Justice Laws, the longest-serving court of appeal judge, called on UK courts to stop deferring to Strasbourg on every issue. The week before, the supreme court justice Lord Sumption criticised the ECHR for exceeding its legitimate powers, and undermining the democratic process.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/dec/04/european-court-uk-supreme-lord-judge

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
European court is not superior to UK supreme court, says Lord Judge. (Original Post) dipsydoodle Dec 2013 OP
The same kind of issue can arise with trade agreements. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #1
The Lord Chief Justice was Lord Judge? Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2013 #2
Indeed. dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #3
Reminds me a bit of Catch-22's Major Major Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2013 #4
There's also Lord Justice Laws mentioned in the OP (nt) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #5
Wonder if there's a dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #8
Yes, I noticed 'Lord Judge' and 'Lord Laws' too! LeftishBrit Dec 2013 #6
I recall when I was doing business studies early seventies dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #9
And then of course LeftishBrit Dec 2013 #10
The first funny couplet I recall dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #11
Can't see how his argument works Anarcho-Socialist Dec 2013 #7

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
6. Yes, I noticed 'Lord Judge' and 'Lord Laws' too!
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 02:00 PM
Dec 2013

In that context, two well-known early 20th century neurologists were called Head and Brain. There is a textbook on animal behaviour by Fox and Tiger, and one on educational psychology by Child. A more unfortunate name was that of the archbishop called Cardinal Sin.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
9. I recall when I was doing business studies early seventies
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 07:23 PM
Dec 2013

one of the lecturers being named Cheetham. Professionally, much to our amusement, he was in partnership with a guy named Bolt.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
11. The first funny couplet I recall
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 05:54 AM
Dec 2013

was republished in Private Eye early sixties. It was a clip of a from a local newspaper in Hampstead announcing the wedding of
Clap - Hands. Whether or not Miss Clap's parents ever saw the humour in this I'll never know.

Wright Hassall

Anarcho-Socialist

(9,601 posts)
7. Can't see how his argument works
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 06:21 PM
Dec 2013

Given that Britain is obliged by treaty to defer to the ECHR, by membership of the Council of Europe (and signing the Convention on Human Rights).

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»European court is not sup...