Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:42 PM Apr 2015

Grant Shapps accused of editing Wikipedia pages of Tory rivals (and the Lib Dem response)

The online encyclopedia, where pages are edited and created by readers, has tracked the changes made by a user called “Contribsx” who has systematically removed embarrassing references on Shapps’ Wikipedia page about the Tory chairman’s business activities as Michael Green, the self-styled millionaire web marketer.

A Guardian investigation found about a third of the contributions made by this user were to Shapps’ own Wikipedia entry while the rest are made up largely of unflattering changes to the online pages to senior political figures – including prominent figures in the Tory party such as Philip Hammond, Justine Greening and Lynton Crosby.
...
The site’s administrators, selected Wikipedia volunteers who patrol the site, told the Guardian that they “believe that the account Contribsx is a sockpuppet of Grant Shapps’ previous accounts on Wikipedia ... and based on the evidence the account is either run by Shapps directly or being run by someone else – an assistant or a PR agency – but under his clear direction.”
...
In his last edit, on Easter Sunday this year, the user went online to change the Wikipedia page of Karl Turner, the shadow attorney general. Two weeks earlier Turner had called on the prime minister to investigate Shapps over his repeated denials, which turned out to be false, that he had acted as “web millionaire” Michael Green while an MP.

The user posted on Turner’s Wiki page that the Labour MP had “admitted breaking House of Commons rules by sending out invitations to a £45-a-head Labour party fundraising event from parliamentary email”. Contribsx did not add that the parliamentary commissioner for standards had dismissed the allegations, originally made by a local Tory councillor.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/21/grant-shapps-accused-of-editing-wikipedia-pages-of-tory-rivals

Instead of writing a standard statement condemning the political opposition of foul play, the Lib Dem response to accusations that the Tory party chairman edited his political rivals’ Wikipedia page took a different approach.

“Grant Shapps is a wonderful human being, a literary great and has in no way ever brought his party or politics into disrepute,” an ironic press release from the party said.
...
“The former Liberal Democrat leader also urged journalists to stop calling Mr Shapps ‘Michael Green’ – because it is definitely not funny and was entirely normal for politicians to use alter-egos.”
...
“He has led the Tories with exemplary skill and if, like me, you have been lucky enough to meet him – you know you have been touched by greatness. Quite simply, a colossus.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/lib-dems-win-prize-for-the-best-press-release-of-the-general-election-campaign-10193562.html

The Lib Dem press release ended:
“This Press Release has been edited by Wikipedia user Contribsx.”
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grant Shapps accused of editing Wikipedia pages of Tory rivals (and the Lib Dem response) (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 OP
Amusing. There's at least a couple of Twitter feeds tracking Wikipedia edits involving Parliament Denzil_DC Apr 2015 #1
No surprise there. Far too many edit on Wikipedia in bad faith and with an agenda - paid or not. forest444 Apr 2015 #3
Sad to say.... T_i_B Apr 2015 #2
to quote Mark and Lard - wwwwwhhhhhhhoooooooo? Ironing Man Apr 2015 #4
Schapps was worse then a mediocre minister T_i_B Apr 2015 #5

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
1. Amusing. There's at least a couple of Twitter feeds tracking Wikipedia edits involving Parliament
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 06:07 PM
Apr 2015
MPs Edits ("Tracks edits to UK MPs' Wikipedia articles&quot : https://twitter.com/mps_edits

Parliament WikiEdits ("Tracks Wikipedia edits made from Parliamentary IPs&quot : https://twitter.com/parliamentedits

Coincidentally, MPs Edits' most recent post at the moment is this:

MPs Edits
@mps_edits · 9m 9 minutes ago

Grant Shapps Wikipedia article edited by Verbcatcher http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=657834956&oldid=657790825
0 retweets 0 favorites


It's not a significant edit in itself (just some tidying up by a Wiki editor of an insertion about Schapps' editing antics - it all gets a bit recursive!), but if anyone's interested in this stuff, there are tools available to track them more or less in real time.

The Talk page for that article's quite a hoot at times.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
3. No surprise there. Far too many edit on Wikipedia in bad faith and with an agenda - paid or not.
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 02:07 AM
Apr 2015

A lot of it is bias, tendentious editing, "POV-pushing", and the like. And more and more of it is of the right-wing, laissez-faire, corporatist bent.

Of the few Brits that I've noticed routinely doing this, the worst one has to be Bob Rayner. Be warned though: the nasty little Thatcherite is well-versed in Wikipedia's passive-aggressive rules of conduct. The ones that promote bias and trolling by making "consensus" - read: imposing preferred text, even op-eds, by simply outnumbering others - paramount even over verifiable fact, while forcing users to always "assume good faith" no matter what.

It's a lot like racists trying to give themselves cover with the absurd notion that racism no longer exists - which this runt seems to be, btw, particularly against Africans.

Ironing Man

(164 posts)
4. to quote Mark and Lard - wwwwwhhhhhhhoooooooo?
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 06:29 PM
Apr 2015

you do wonder what Cameron/Hague et al see in him - a mediocre minister at best, no great media performer, not exactly the mightiest intellect in modern politics - he's just a grubby little spiv with all the charm of cold dogshit.

he's not exactly in Camerons social circle, and i rather doubt anyone with the brains of Boris, Osbourne or Hague would employ him to wipe piss off the floor...

T_i_B

(14,738 posts)
5. Schapps was worse then a mediocre minister
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:58 AM
Apr 2015

He was the "brains" behind the bedroom tax. IMHO he's the worst frontbench politician in Britain right now. Quite a feat when you consider the likes of Jeremy Hunt, Eric Pickles, George Osborne, Tristram Hunt, Liam Byrne and Rachel Reeves.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Grant Shapps accused of e...