United Kingdom
Related: About this forumGrant Shapps accused of editing Wikipedia pages of Tory rivals (and the Lib Dem response)
A Guardian investigation found about a third of the contributions made by this user were to Shapps own Wikipedia entry while the rest are made up largely of unflattering changes to the online pages to senior political figures including prominent figures in the Tory party such as Philip Hammond, Justine Greening and Lynton Crosby.
...
The sites administrators, selected Wikipedia volunteers who patrol the site, told the Guardian that they believe that the account Contribsx is a sockpuppet of Grant Shapps previous accounts on Wikipedia ... and based on the evidence the account is either run by Shapps directly or being run by someone else an assistant or a PR agency but under his clear direction.
...
In his last edit, on Easter Sunday this year, the user went online to change the Wikipedia page of Karl Turner, the shadow attorney general. Two weeks earlier Turner had called on the prime minister to investigate Shapps over his repeated denials, which turned out to be false, that he had acted as web millionaire Michael Green while an MP.
The user posted on Turners Wiki page that the Labour MP had admitted breaking House of Commons rules by sending out invitations to a £45-a-head Labour party fundraising event from parliamentary email. Contribsx did not add that the parliamentary commissioner for standards had dismissed the allegations, originally made by a local Tory councillor.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/21/grant-shapps-accused-of-editing-wikipedia-pages-of-tory-rivals
Grant Shapps is a wonderful human being, a literary great and has in no way ever brought his party or politics into disrepute, an ironic press release from the party said.
...
The former Liberal Democrat leader also urged journalists to stop calling Mr Shapps Michael Green because it is definitely not funny and was entirely normal for politicians to use alter-egos.
...
He has led the Tories with exemplary skill and if, like me, you have been lucky enough to meet him you know you have been touched by greatness. Quite simply, a colossus.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/lib-dems-win-prize-for-the-best-press-release-of-the-general-election-campaign-10193562.html
The Lib Dem press release ended:
This Press Release has been edited by Wikipedia user Contribsx.
Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)Parliament WikiEdits ("Tracks Wikipedia edits made from Parliamentary IPs" : https://twitter.com/parliamentedits
Coincidentally, MPs Edits' most recent post at the moment is this:
@mps_edits · 9m 9 minutes ago
Grant Shapps Wikipedia article edited by Verbcatcher http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=657834956&oldid=657790825
0 retweets 0 favorites
It's not a significant edit in itself (just some tidying up by a Wiki editor of an insertion about Schapps' editing antics - it all gets a bit recursive!), but if anyone's interested in this stuff, there are tools available to track them more or less in real time.
The Talk page for that article's quite a hoot at times.
forest444
(5,902 posts)A lot of it is bias, tendentious editing, "POV-pushing", and the like. And more and more of it is of the right-wing, laissez-faire, corporatist bent.
Of the few Brits that I've noticed routinely doing this, the worst one has to be Bob Rayner. Be warned though: the nasty little Thatcherite is well-versed in Wikipedia's passive-aggressive rules of conduct. The ones that promote bias and trolling by making "consensus" - read: imposing preferred text, even op-eds, by simply outnumbering others - paramount even over verifiable fact, while forcing users to always "assume good faith" no matter what.
It's a lot like racists trying to give themselves cover with the absurd notion that racism no longer exists - which this runt seems to be, btw, particularly against Africans.
T_i_B
(14,738 posts)....that this isn't surprising, given that it's Grant Schapps.
Ironing Man
(164 posts)you do wonder what Cameron/Hague et al see in him - a mediocre minister at best, no great media performer, not exactly the mightiest intellect in modern politics - he's just a grubby little spiv with all the charm of cold dogshit.
he's not exactly in Camerons social circle, and i rather doubt anyone with the brains of Boris, Osbourne or Hague would employ him to wipe piss off the floor...
T_i_B
(14,738 posts)He was the "brains" behind the bedroom tax. IMHO he's the worst frontbench politician in Britain right now. Quite a feat when you consider the likes of Jeremy Hunt, Eric Pickles, George Osborne, Tristram Hunt, Liam Byrne and Rachel Reeves.