Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,204 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 07:13 PM Jun 2013

Jury: No medical negligence in penile implant that left patient with an 8 month erection

Last edited Mon Jun 17, 2013, 08:45 PM - Edit history (1)

WILMINGTON, Del. — A jury in Delaware says there was no medical negligence in a penile implant procedure that the patient said left him with an 8-month erection.

The New Castle County Superior Court jury decided that urologist Dr. Thomas Desperito was not negligent in the procedure he performed in December 2009 on 44-year-old truck driver Daniel Metzgar.

The News Journal of Wilmington reported (http://delonline.us/11KM4Z8 ) that during the weeklong trial, Metzgar testified that his constant erection drew taunts from family and friends, as well as stares, slurs and threats from strangers. He testified that the procedure caused him to withdraw from much of life, wearing long, baggy sweat pants and a long shirt to hide his condition.

Metzgar had the prosthesis removed in August 2010, after tubing from the device punctured his scrotum.

Source: http://amarillo.com/news/national-news/2013-06-17/jury-no-medical-negligence-penile-implant

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury: No medical negligence in penile implant that left patient with an 8 month erection (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jun 2013 OP
after reading the original story d_r Jun 2013 #1
You are right, I'm editing to remove the violin. TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #2
naw I'm not being harsh to you d_r Jun 2013 #3
Thanks, that's a self-imposed spanking. TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #4

d_r

(6,907 posts)
1. after reading the original story
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 08:39 PM
Jun 2013

I have some sympathy for the guy if his side is true. It wasn't a cosmetic implant, he got it for impotence because he's diabetic.

TexasTowelie

(112,204 posts)
2. You are right, I'm editing to remove the violin.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 08:45 PM
Jun 2013

There are plenty of other people that are malicious that deserve the "violin". Thanks for reminding me of his circumstances--I was out of line.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Weird News»Jury: No medical negligen...