Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWill there be a Clinton/Sanders debate in May?
http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016-debate-schedule/2016-democratic-primary-debate-schedule/18 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
0 (0%) |
|
No | |
18 (100%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
drray23
(7,633 posts)The nomination is pretty much sealed. In fact, it would be a bad idea to allow for an other debate where they would tear at each other. We do not need to do the work for the GOP. I am pretty sure there will be no debates.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)But still, why give him the opportunity to land any blows and to continue his attacks? She should concentrate on public appearances, town halls, fundraising and GOTV efforts.
Go, Hillary! We love you!
Yes, I said fundraising ... that should really piss-off some people and draw them into this group's thread.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Sanders will still push for it because he loves to hear himself repeat the same talking points over, and over, and over...
LisaM
(27,813 posts)The last one didn't exactly work out well for him. All anyone saw was a red-faced Sanders waving his finger. And she shone. His rowdy bros in the audience didn't improve things.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)The media isn't going to carry that water for him twice.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)with his obnoxious behavior and enjoy the run Hillary!
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)I'm sick of debates. I bet that he is going to try and push for one before June 7th.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)And then interrupt the mods?
I couldn't stand the last one.
Koinos
(2,792 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)We don't need anymore debates.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)Bernie will figure that repeating his stump speech, telling America that Hillary voted for the Iraq War and made speeches to Goldman Sachs, and wagging his finger at her eventually has GOT to work, doesn't it?, and that it will finally work for California. Because...well, you know, by the time California hits he'll only be about 450 delegates behind and by winning 500 delegates there, he can put Hillary away in one foul swoop.
The only explanation is he's smoking bath salts.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)I concur with all of you!
Treant
(1,968 posts)There's gotta be a little gremlin in the Clinton campaign whispering "yes." So far, Sanders has done so-so at best in debates, and he tends to lose the following state by wider than expected margins.
However, I don't think too many media people, or the Clinton campaign itself, will consider him a viable candidate after next Tuesday if it goes as I think it will (and as the data says it will).
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,034 posts)So Tad Devine and Jeff Weaver can pad their paycheck?
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)livetohike
(22,145 posts)think America has seen enough to make a decision.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)its onto GE mode.