Hillary Clinton

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts) Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:43 AM Apr 2016

It appears Hillary voters were more disenfranchised in Brooklyn. HRC ROOM

Contrary to what we are reading on DU the vast majority of purged voters came not from Sanders strongholds but Clinton strongholds.

THIS WAS DONE ON PURPOSE! PEOPLE AT THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS NEED TO GO TO JAIL.

Most of those who were purged came from heavily African American neighborhoods, not Sanders areas. Here in southern Brooklyn which is still predominantly white and suprisingly went to Sanders, we did not have have the issues they had in areas like Brownsville Brooklyn.

THEY NEED TO ALLOW THE AFFIDAVIT BALLOTS TO BE COUNTED HERE. They will tell the story.

Whole blocks were purged and they were not in Sanders areas. Clinton Hill went to Hillary because of a large African American population but they had a whole block purged from the roll.

I know that Sanders supporters want to continue the meme that Sanders supporters were targeted but it is bull. Sanders neighborhoods in Brooklyn did not have the problem on the level Clinton's did.

My friends at Kings County/Brooklyn headquaters tell me people are in trouble and the assumption is this was done on purpose.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It appears Hillary voters were more disenfranchised in Brooklyn. HRC ROOM (Original Post) hrmjustin Apr 2016 OP

I think she lost alot apcalc Apr 2016 #1

Wow DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #2

Yes, it was the HRC voters who were disenfranchised. Iliyah Apr 2016 #3

And it was still a blow out liberal N proud Apr 2016 #4

Hopefully they will determine what happened. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #5

This is what makes sense pandr32 Apr 2016 #6

They must be the victim Gman Apr 2016 #7

Since it is the black vote, it doesn't count to Berners Haveadream Apr 2016 #8

That must be a defensive 'scacasm' since you said truth. eom fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #9

Yep Haveadream Apr 2016 #11

Yes. fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #14

KNR Thank you! Lucinda Apr 2016 #10

hah sarae Apr 2016 #12

Oh No! I hope they get resolution, Justin.. it's terrible not to have your voted counted. Cha Apr 2016 #13

apcalc

(4,465 posts)

1. I think she lost alot

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:44 AM

Apr 2016

Of votes there.

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)

2. Wow

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:49 AM

Apr 2016

Will wait for more updates from you, as you're there, as this develops.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

3. Yes, it was the HRC voters who were disenfranchised.

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 11:53 AM

Apr 2016

liberal N proud

(60,335 posts)

4. And it was still a blow out

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:19 PM

Apr 2016

If it was truly voter purges, then someone needs to go to jail. If it was as I have been saying all along that people just didn't pay attention to the rules and couldn't vote because they didn't register Democrat, then tough.

LiberalFighter

(50,943 posts)

5. Hopefully they will determine what happened.

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:35 PM

Apr 2016

There needs to be fine tuning with voter registration.

All American citizens are automatically registered to vote with opt out available.

Interfacing with motor vehicle to automatically update address, transferring voter registration from state to state or city to city. Software needs to provide confirmation of specific action such as party affiliation. It should show current status and specify confirmation or ask if a change is desired.

Allow voting even if voter has moved by providing confirmation. They should have the option of voting at the voting location with full slate of candidates or at old location but limited to elections at county level or above. Or city and above if in city.

Provide necessary funding for elections.

Review the laws in each state regarding the conduct of elections and determine what would work better.

pandr32

(11,588 posts)

6. This is what makes sense

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:40 PM

Apr 2016

Disenfranchisement efforts are meant to keep power in Republican hands. Communities with high minority demographics tend to vote Democrat.

Gman

(24,780 posts)

7. They must be the victim

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:05 PM

Apr 2016

and they must be one for any reason, real or imagined.

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)

8. Since it is the black vote, it doesn't count to Berners

Reply to hrmjustin (Original post)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:10 PM

Apr 2016

Just like in Arizona when it was the poor Latino vote that would have voted for Hillary. They've already told us whose votes count in this election. It is only disenfranchisement when it happens to them.

Most of those who were purged came from heavily African American neighborhoods, not Sanders areas. Here in southern Brooklyn which is still predominantly white and suprisingly went to Sanders, we did not have have the issues they had in areas like Brownsville Brooklyn.

Whole blocks were purged and they were not in Sanders areas. Clinton Hill went to Hillary because of a large African American population but they had a whole block purged from the roll.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)

9. That must be a defensive 'scacasm' since you said truth. eom

Reply to Haveadream (Reply #8)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 05:57 PM

Apr 2016

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)

11. Yep

Reply to fleabiscuit (Reply #9)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:34 PM

Apr 2016

The hypocrisy is stunning. They care not one whit about irregularities unless they are impacted. The free for all attitude regarding the caucuses in which so many Hillary supporters were unable to get representation is gleefully celebrated. I can never forget the way they disrespected and booed Dolores Huerta and John Lewis. They have no sense of proportion, history or the people who have been on the front lines fighting for their rights.