Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumI alerted a thread post on GD-P and guess what.
Here's the thread's opening post directed to all Hillary supporters:
I was immediately informed that another alert had already occurred and the jury voted to keep the post, 4-3.
Can you believe these guys?
LisaM
(27,813 posts)I almost commented on the thread, but it's either the highest irony and is flying over everyone's heads, it's a plant, or it's just someone who can't be reasoned with.
And, it should not be allowed.
athena
(4,187 posts)I don't know why I even visit BU.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)to the site until they've rid the place of such posts.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)sounds like something they would like to be involved with.
mopinko
(70,127 posts)they all end up as a toxic swamp of whiners.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Very positive Hillary support!
Walk away
(9,494 posts)I only donate to actual Democratic sites now.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Values. We know what Democratic values are.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)I stated that it was an attack on Democrats. Hillary Clinton, The Democratic Party, and the rest of us.
still_one
(92,219 posts)admins should review it. I am not optimistic though.
What is even worst is some of the replies to the OP that support it.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)...this site will cease to be "BernieUnderground!".
PEACE!
IamMab
(1,359 posts)Squinch
(50,955 posts)hide their trollericiousness.
We need to have standards, dammit!
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)are able to enforce the vote for Democrats rule.
I promise.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)Treant
(1,968 posts)(I never had one in the past, but it's relatively recently that I started commenting rather than lurking).
The place would require a good housecleaning and a sea change before I'd consider supporting it--or this might happen again and I won't have my dollars going to support that.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)The scramble for that "narrow path" of his will be frantic.
Treant
(1,968 posts)can't navigate a path as narrow as it is right now. After tomorrow?
Perhaps American science can investigate developing a nano-robot than can handle a path that fine.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)true Democrats. In fact it calls Hillary supporters republicans
It is a disgrace that this post would be allowed
It is pure crazy talk:
"You might only a Democrat because you were a Republican and voted for George W Bush. You were so embarrassed that you changed parties and became a Democrat"
There is something really sick and twisted with some of these supporters.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Once again, I appear to have chosen well.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)It will be banned again soon
still_one
(92,219 posts)button on that notification, and explain why you think the admins should take a look at these attacks against all Hillary supporters.
wisteria
(19,581 posts)I think we all know that Sander's is not what we consider a true Democrat. But,for one of his supporters to have the nerve to define us as anti Democrat because of whom we support, is disrespectful and suggests that we are not capable of making a smart decision. Of course, we know better, and we know who the true Democrat is, as well as the candidate who is the most knowledgeable, and experienced-Hillary Clinton!
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)And they accuse us of not thinking.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)The sock must ve figured another ban coming