Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,531 posts)
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:23 PM May 2016

"Scrutinizing both"

The WSJ editorial board is seething. Of course. So it was interesting to read the conclusion of their editorial

Our own approach during the next six months will be to scrutinize Mr. Trump as we will Mrs. Clinton—with an eye on what is in the best interest of free people and American prosperity. As unappealing as this election choice is, one of them will be the next President. We have to make the best of that reality.

Of course, Hillary may be better off without the endorsement of the WSJ still..


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Scrutinizing both" (Original Post) question everything May 2016 OP
Amusing. And puzzling. Isn't she the corporatists' darling? spooky3 May 2016 #1
Yes because Trump and HRC are on the same level! Her Sister May 2016 #2
Hahahahaha! ismnotwasm May 2016 #3

spooky3

(34,472 posts)
1. Amusing. And puzzling. Isn't she the corporatists' darling?
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016


If she were, WSJ would be thrilled to endorse her.
 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
2. Yes because Trump and HRC are on the same level!
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

Will be hard to come up with what makes them different!



Aholes Media!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»"Scrutinizing both"