Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBernie Refuses to Say That a Democratic Presidency Is More Important Than a Sanders Presidency
http://bluenationreview.com/bernie-refuses-to-say-that-a-democratic-presidency-is-more-important-than-a-sanders-presidency/Steve Inskeep gave Bernie two bites at the apple. All he had to say was that a Democratic presidencythat is, preventing a Trump presidencyis more important than a Sanders presidency.
Essentially, the question boils down to this: Is Bernies priority getting himself elected, even if that risks a Trump presidency, or is it getting a Democrat elected, even if its Hillary?
His non-answer makes his priorities abundantly clear.
Transcript: NPR's Interview With Bernie Sanders
http://www.npr.org/2016/05/05/476767525/transcript-nprs-interview-with-bernie-sanders
SANDERS: Well, I think that if you look at the issues facing this country, and the differences between Secretary Clinton and myself, I think, a) my policies and my agenda will be better for the working families of this country, and second of all, if you look at virtually every poll thats out thereincluding one from CNN todayBernie Sanders does better against Donald Trump than does Hillary Clinton. So if we want to make sure that we do not have a Donald Trump in the White House, I think that at this point Bernie Sanders is the strongest candidate.
INSKEEP: Do you mean a Sanders presidency is more important than this persons suggestion that a Democratic presidency might be more important?
SANDERS: Well, what Im just suggesting isif you look at every poll thats out thereBernie Sanders does better against Donald Trump, more likely to defeat Donald Trump, than Hillary Clinton.
LuvLoogie
(7,015 posts)Cha
(297,367 posts)here.
There will be no "sanders presidency".. that's a fantasy in his own head.
sarae
(3,284 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)So they will all be kissing his ass and asking softballs. This should get the Followers in a raucous good mood tonight!
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)fairly tough on him lately. Hope that she keeps it up.
Within a week, the interviews should dry up (at least I HOPE!). If only for the reason that it'll take precious time away from covering more Donald Trump all the time.
still_one
(92,266 posts)campaign and supporters have hurled at Hillary and her supporters, that if somehow he miraculously gained the nomination, I cannot say I would vote for him in the GE
Everything he is doing now is giving support to Trump against Hillary that vile vindictive loser will never get my support
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)As I can recall, the only time he has ever said anything nice about Hillary, or the party in general, is when he was trying to overcome a spate of negative press caused by his criticisms. This just reinforces the fact that he honestly believes that Democrats are just as bad as Republicans, and that he's the only politician in the country worth supporting.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)Even the "enough of the damn e-mails!" was pure pandering. Hillary actually cut him off and took control back, too, or he would have continued on with some kind of blathering after hijacking her answer. He kind of had egg on his face.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)SANDERS: Well I thought my point was, that it's true of Secretary Clinton, it's true of Bernie Sanders, it is true of Donald Trump you want to go out and win elections, you've got to convince the people of this country that you are the candidate that works best for their interests. And I think there's a lot of work that has to be done on the part of all of the candidates.
INSKEEP: The reason I ask is because you did say earlier in the campaign she was not qualified. Can you convince yourself, or have you convinced yourself, that she is qualified?
SANDERS: Right now as I have said many times, Steve I think that a Donald Trump presidency would be a disaster for this country. And I intend to do everything that I can to see that that does not happen.
INSKEEP: Does that mean to say that you would be out this fall if you don't win the nomination, campaigning?
SANDERS: You know, as I just said Steve, I think that a Donald Trump presidency would be a disaster for this country.
I am the most progressive member of the Unites States Senate, I think. I have fought as hard as I can for working people, and I'm not going to see a president come into office like a Donald Trump, who is busy dividing us up in terms of picking on Mexicans, and Latinos, and Muslims, and women, and veterans, and African-Americans. That is not the type of president that we need, and that is not the type of president that I I will do everything in my power to make sure that he does not become our president,
So, Steve, so thank you so much...
INSKEEP: Senator? Do you mind if I ask one more question?
SANDERS: One last question. Sure, we got time for one more.
INSKEEP: Yeah just, talk me through because you said you have tough path, but one that you can walk I'm just interested about a little bit of the mechanics here.
You'd have to win a lot of delegates a great majority of delegates along the way to get a majority of pledged delegates. There are some big states ahead it's certainly true but just the way delegates are awarded, even if you win California, even if you win West Virginia, you don't get all of the delegates. They're not winner-take-all. Doesn't that make this extraordinarily difficult for you to...
SANDERS: Yes, it's an uphill battle. But you know what? Steve, when I started this campaign, it was an extraordinarily uphill battle we were 60 points behind Secretary Clinton. Polls out there in the last few weeks, a few had us ahead actually in national polls, or a few points behind. The path to victory is to do extremely well in the remaining states and as you indicate, California, of course, is the largest state. And we hope to do well there, and win that state.
INSKEEP: Could and is...
SANDERS: But here is the other path, Steve you asked me a question, let me give you an answer here is that we have won a number of states, in Washington and New Hampshire, by landslide victories, and I'm talking about 65, 70, 75 percent of the vote. I think it is incumbent on the superdelegates
The problem, one of the main problems that we have, is that the establishment Democrats, of course, supporting all of virtually all of them are supporting Hillary Clinton. I think that in those states where we have won landslide victories, those delegates should reflect the wishes of the people of their state and give us their votes.
And then I think we have got to make the case to the superdelegates, who in many cases, were on board for Hillary Clinton even before I got into the race, that they should take a hard look at which candidate is stronger against Donald Trump. And I think we can make that case.
INSKEEP: Let me follow up on that...
SANDERS: Steve I apologize one more question, because I've gotta run here.
INSKEEP: Is there a real danger that Donald Trump now that he's the presumptive Republican nominee that he's the kind of different candidate who might seriously appeal to the very kinds of voters that you've been appealing to all this time, that you want to bring back to the Democratic Party?
SANDERS: Is that a serious you mean...
INSKEEP: A real danger of that, yeah, in the fall?
SANDERS: You say a risk? Well, you know as I said a moment ago what campaigns are about is going out and making a case to the American people. Does Donald Trump have support in this country? Of course he has support he has won the Republican nomination, so of course he has a lot of support. He has won it overwhelmingly in state after state after state.
INSKEEP: Can he drag Democrats over to the Republican side?
SANDERS: Well the question, I think that's the wrong question, Steve. The question is, why is somebody with Donald Trump's perspective appealing to Democrats?
That gets back to the question we talked about at the beginning of this conversation. Has the Democratic Party, has the leadership made the case that they are standing there, fighting for the poor people of McDowell County, or the working people of Indiana, or of New Mexico, or of California? Have they stood up and said that "maybe we gotta take on the billionaire class, maybe it's wrong that the top one-tenth of 1 percent now owns almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, maybe we should not be getting significant sums of money from Wall Street or from the pharmaceutical industry that charge us the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs," you know, "maybe we've gotta stand with the people who for the last 20 or 30 years have seen a decline in their standard of living"?
You know, those are the issues that the Democratic Party has got to ask itself. And I think when it does, and it makes it clear that they are prepared to take on the big-money interests, I think the Democratic Party will do just fine and that's kind of what this campaign is about.
http://www.npr.org/2016/05/05/476767525/transcript-nprs-interview-with-bernie-sanders
His last response...
SunSeeker
(51,576 posts)It shows that he does not consider himself part of the Democratic Party.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)I just read that and the last remaining tattered shreds of any positive sentiment towards Bernie left me completely.
pandr32
(11,594 posts)From what his answers reveal he has no intention of ever campaigning for Sec. Clinton. He will be a bitter enemy right up until the November election. He, by doing so, will be helping Donald Trump.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)If he gave a damn about democrats winning the white house and control of congress he would have ended the race days ago when it was clear he is not going to win.
I believe he wants to inflict maximum damage as possible to Hillary, bring chaos to the dem convention then start a third party run for president that will ensure a Trump victory.
If Bernie cant bring the "revolution" they want Trump to do it by destroying the country.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)We are lucky. But we don't want millions of people to suffer through decades of disenfranchisement and ruin, and so many of those folks are Bernie Followers.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)MUCH too optimistic.
I don't believe that ANYONE will weather a Trump/GOP takeover. I don't believe that the WORLD will weather it either.
Unfortunately, I am in no way whatsoever being hyperbolic.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I have no doubt.
I think Trump will cause a worldwide Great Depression with his bagger BS which will lead to wars all over the planet and the rise of fascist governments to try and control their despairing populations.
The republicans teabagger fantasies are about to come true if democrats don't stop them in the fall and many people supposedly on our side are rooting for Trump and his minions to "bring the revolution".
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)answer by his deeds to those questions.
His strategy dumps all democratic ideals down the crapper. I see this echoed everywhere in the call that Super Delegates must ignore the will of the Democratic Primary voters and give the nomination to Sanders.
LisaM
(27,815 posts)That's even got to annoy his supporters.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)The Donald suffers from it as well. Bernie/Donald are like brothers from another mother!
MBS
(9,688 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Reading Julius Cæsar was the first time I remember learning about someone speaking in the third person... Something done by emperors, kings, and the utterly pompous for no reason.
Gothmog
(145,372 posts)Sanders does not care about the Democratic Party or any down ballot candidates. Sanders only cares about himself which is sad
ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)During one rousing speech, about green energy, he said we could "get trucks off the road" and This is the crux of the problem. Yes, absolutely we need to go green. We need to do it now, and if the truth is known, we needed to do it a long time ago because we've started a process that we may be too late in stopping. Because, as you know--there is the rest of the world.
But "trucks off the road" as part of a stump speech, should include where and how the trucking industry will be retrained, where those jobs will go, what they will be replaced with.
There is no "ever after" with Sanders. No addressing of fallout. Only simple answers to complex situations. President Obama made a start with his green energy programs. Building and expanding on those, while creating jobs is the way to go--the only successful pathway I can see.
He should back the Democratic Party, but he doesn't, and I believe he doesn't because he is, after all, who he is--an enemy of the so-called status quo (another simplistic view that only harms). He literally can't say "At this point in History, electing Democrats in the most important thing we can do for our country, the most important thing we can do for the world"--not and maintain the luxury of being the "outsider". Part of this is has to be ego, because Sanders clearly knows how politics works, has to know that 'tearing it all down" is not going to get green legislation passed in time. We are out of time. This kind of hypocrisy is what I find ultimately frustrating, he says the right things, but pretends there is an instant pathway to those things. His obstructionist nature will set back progress decades, and I can't begin tell you how relieved I am he won't be the nominee.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)There's been so much green progress under Obama that you can now buy a solar generator for around $2000. That's real progress!
Get rid of trucks? I'm still waiting for my flying car.
ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)Tired of him.
nini
(16,672 posts)IF he is the convinced everyone thinks like him then he'd have no problem. The fact he chooses to 'destroy' the Democrats because he doesn't agree with everything instead of 'leaving' it speaks volumes and his narcissist revolution.
He makes me ill.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)election.