Name recognition polls means squat.

Anyone who support HRCafter the primaried are underway remains nuts. I support Democrats and Hillary remains a Third Wayer, fully kissing the butts of Goldman-Sachs.

In other words, no chance of winning. She is no Democrat no matter how you defend her. For shame.

Ill show myself out. As in trashing this forum. I wish you would wake up and realize that she is, overall, a bad idea and a bad candidate. We need to go left, not further right.

Good luck.

promoted by the Right wing who don't want to go against Hillary and the uninformed.

Clinton is a Democrat in every way shape and form. He votes, her stances and everything she stands for is
what the Democrats stand for.
Pro-choice, pro-union, pro-women, pro-gay rights... etc.
She takes money from Wall Street. SO what? It's smart. There is no proof whatsoever that it is any different than taking union money or Emily's list money or any other group.

not that it matters, but she ain't poor.

this is her financial disclosure forms... not easy reading, but others have done it: http://ia600805.us.archive.org/13/items/ElizabethWarrenSenatePfd/ElizabethWarrenSenateCampaignDisclosure.pdf

Article from business insider with a list of freshmen millionaires:

http://www.businessinsider.com/richest-congress-new-freshmen-2013-1#12-elizabeth-warren-d-mass-12

12. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)

AP
Net Worth: Between $4,609,025 and $14,696,000

I am looking forward to working for her campaign. I hear those saying numbers do not count and it is only name recognition, yes she has the numbers and name recognition and also has a good record of working years for Democratic principles, she will serve our nation well.

Contributions her PACs are entitled before she announces. I saw where Al Franken said she would make a good president, Howard Dean has made a similar statement and Warren Buffett has made a donation to her Ready for Hillary PAC, George Soros has also made a contribution. She is smart and has more world experience from her SOS days. We have her professional trashers but her record can stand their over and over runs. It only gives me more reason to look for the truth.

Polls this early are just mental masturbation.

I assume you are a Hillary fan. I have no problem with that. Personally, I would prefer Elisibeth but SHE'S NOT RUNNING! I would expect Hillary's numbers (who we all are pretty sure IS running) to be better than anyone else who is not running. Don't get me wrong. If Hillary is the nominee, I will vote for her before I will ever vote for whatever Klan member the other side puts up but I would prefer someone not quite so in bed with the banksters.