1.5 million doesn't come out of that too many times.

I am sure he has received a infusion of $27 contributions but still, that has to really hurt his abilities.

rather than excoriating him since they're a RW "news" source.

I've never known them to commit actual journalism; if they are correct, great. But I would take it with a huge grain of sat, even though it is good for our side. I hate when the other side quotes rwnj sources, so I hate when we do it too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times

Political stance

In a 2008 Harper's Magazine essay criticizing American conservatism, liberal historian[73] Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper—the Washington Times—published strictly for the movement's benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.[74]
In 2009 The New York Times reported:

With its conservative editorial bent, the paper also became a crucial training ground for many rising conservative journalists and a must-read for those in the movement. A veritable who's who of conservatives—Tony Blankley, Frank J. Gaffney Jr., Larry Kudlow, John Podhoretz and Tony Snow—has churned out copy for its pages.[41]

Though not listed, another conservative writer who trained there was New York Times op-ed columnist David Brooks, a Washington Times editorial writer in the 1980s.

I will look for another more credible link.
Thanks

I thought you might not know.