Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,488 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:24 PM May 2016

Can we please just stop playing the 'man card'?

Cross posting from GDP

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512069129

Donald Trump’s warning that Hillary Clinton supporters should not play the “woman card” in this election has been generating a slow burn in my psyche. The real problem is that the “man card” has been played for so many centuries — in businesses, homes, schools, religious institutions and governing bodies — that when we consider a candidate for our highest office, even many women are incapable of judging a female candidate’s qualities without comparing her to all the male-only candidates in America’s 240-year history.

(snip)

Instead of facing these prejudices, we make up all sorts of bogus reasons why it’s just this particular candidate that we are not comfortable with:

She’s too establishment. What could be more establishment than electing another male president? Isn’t 44 in a row glaring enough evidence of gender inequity in our society?

You can’t trust her. Give me a break. We’ve observed this woman for 25 years. What’s not to trust? We’ve observed her as first lady — both for a governor and a president — as a senator, the secretary of state, a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a supporter of human rights, a lawyer. She has devoted her life to public service. She sat for hours on end testifying about her personal e-mail system that she used as secretary of state — which, incidentally, was also the practice of Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, but you don’t see them testifying about it before congressional committees ad nauseam.

She’s too guarded. You would be a little circumspect about what you said and how you said it, too, if you had suffered 25 years of brutal verbal abuse, lack of respect and outright degradation by the opposing party. If I were she, I’d be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Wouldn’t you prefer a president who thinks about the ramifications of her statements before she speaks, rather than someone who blurts out what is expedient at the moment, then changes his stance, so that you can never rely on what he says?

(snip)

She’s not exciting, it’s the tone of her voice, her pantsuits, etc. Come on, folks. We are interviewing candidates for the most important office in the United States, arguably the most important world leader. We are not interviewing a candidate for “The Bachelorette” or “The Apprentice.” Do you want someone who has traveled to 112 countries, met and established rapport with their leaders, or someone who doesn’t even know the names of these leaders or what country they are from?

(snip)

I wonder if anyone is keeping track of the amount of time on all of the news stations that is being spent on each candidate. I observe glaring differences that constitute a subtle but definite indication of preference given to male candidates, in a media establishment that is substantially owned and run by males.

It is high time we stop playing the man card.

Coleen Carlstedt-Johnson is a retired attorney in Brooklyn Park, MN

http://www.startribune.com/can-we-please-just-stop-playing-the-man-card/380888531/



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can we please just stop playing the 'man card'? (Original Post) question everything May 2016 OP
They are just saying Hillary is more qualified. Thinkingabout May 2016 #1
The reception on GDP was hostile, of course question everything May 2016 #7
I love this part: sarae May 2016 #2
Not to mention complain jane May 2016 #4
K & R SunSeeker May 2016 #3
Thanks for posting this. athena May 2016 #5
K&R! DemonGoddess May 2016 #6

question everything

(47,488 posts)
7. The reception on GDP was hostile, of course
Sat May 28, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

still, I added a comment that some of this reminds me of the attacks on Obama by the right wingers. Supposedly all raising real objectives but in reality a sheer cover of attacks because he is black.

The arguments above are the same. They would never be seriously considered had she have only one X chromosome.

sarae

(3,284 posts)
2. I love this part:
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:50 PM
May 2016

She’s not exciting, it’s the tone of her voice, her pantsuits, etc. Come on, folks. We are interviewing candidates for the most important office in the United States, arguably the most important world leader. We are not interviewing a candidate for “The Bachelorette” or “The Apprentice.” Do you want someone who has traveled to 112 countries, met and established rapport with their leaders, or someone who doesn’t even know the names of these leaders or what country they are from?

complain jane

(4,302 posts)
4. Not to mention
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:09 AM
May 2016

She traveled to 112 countries and established a rapport with their leaders while Donald Trump was crank calling television shows as "John Miller" to say women wanted to bang him.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Can we please just stop p...