Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumIt’s the Hillary Coalition
http://bit.ly/1T569o6<snip>
Unlike many presidential candidates past and present, Hillary isnt building relationships from scratch. Shes doesnt have to plead with various voting blocs to support her because they supported the last guy, he did a great job and she is from the same party. Her long and substantive career has familiarized and endeared her to diverse demographic groups. From her first days in public service, Hillary has been a leading national voice for women. As first lady, she developed relationships with constituencies and organizations representing Americans of all walks of life. In the United States Senate, she represented a state with significant Latino, African American, Asian American & Pacific Islander and LGBTQ communities. She doesnt need a crash course to understand the fabric of America and the policies that impact diverse groups. She doesnt use a cheat sheet on the names and backgrounds of prominent leaders in key communities. Instead, she draws on her own life experience, her own relationships and her own track record as she talks about how she would build upon the progress President Obama has made.
See: 2008.
Even before the term Obama Coalition entered the political lexicon, both Hillary and then-Sen. Obama assembled impressive electoral coalitions that held throughout the 2008 primary campaign. Hillary performed strongest among women, union households, Latinos, LGBTQ and AAPI voters groups that contributed heavily to the 18 million votes she earned in that election. These groups werent voting against then-Sen. Obama (they supported him heavily in two general elections). They were voting for Hillary. Similarly, groups comprising President Obamas winning primary election coalition namely young voters, African Americans and white progressives werent voting against Hillary; they were voting for then-Sen. Obama.
There is zero evidence to suggest that Hillary primary voters rejected then-Sen. Obama in the 2008 or 2012 general elections. So after Hillary served as the presidents secretary of state, and as she is on the campaign trail touting President Obamas achievements and their joint work, theres even less reason to think that President Obamas strongest supporters would reject Hillary in 2016. Logic, data, and conversations on the ground say just the opposite. Just look at her whopping 70-point leads among African American voters in South Carolina primary polls.
<snip>
The 2016 electorates 18-, 19-, 20- and 21-year olds have never voted before. In fact, they were as young as 10 years old in the 2008 general election. The question is not whether Hillary can convince the same young voters who voted for President Obama to also vote for her. The question is whether Hillary has her own appeal to the new, more diverse, more progressive group of voters who now comprise this age demographic. After travelling to 60 college campuses and meeting young Hillary supporters across the country, I believe that answer is yes. In fact, if there is a single underrated area of support and enthusiasm for Hillary, its among Americas youngest voters.
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 648 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It’s the Hillary Coalition (Original Post)
Starry Messenger
Nov 2015
OP
Not just SC, but her leads nationally among AA's & Hispanics is nothing short of spectacular.
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2015
#2
bravenak
(34,648 posts)1. YO!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)2. Not just SC, but her leads nationally among AA's & Hispanics is nothing short of spectacular.
There is zero evidence to suggest that Hillary primary voters rejected then-Sen. Obama in the 2008 or 2012 general elections. So after Hillary served as the presidents secretary of state, and as she is on the campaign trail touting President Obamas achievements and their joint work, theres even less reason to think that President Obamas strongest supporters would reject Hillary in 2016. Logic, data, and conversations on the ground say just the opposite. Just look at her whopping 70-point leads among African American voters in South Carolina primary polls
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)3. Real world 1 -- DU 0
I predict a whomping.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)4. It will be so cool!!!!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)6. Maybe a sweeping whomping.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)5. Why not a repeat of 2008?
The biggest change from Hillarys performance in 2008 to todays primary landscape is in the South, particularly because of Hillarys strength among African American voters. In fact, the same non-caucus states where Hillary was trounced in 2008 are the states where she is on track to trounce her primary opponents in 2016. Then-Sen. Obama swept the Deep South by whopping margins over Hillary. Eight years later, shes primed to rack up big delegate margins as South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana all vote within 11 days of each other starting on February 27. This projected success shows just how much the Hillary Coalition has grown since 2008, and its a demographic strength she will carry into the general election should she be the Democratic nominee.