Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:59 PM Jan 2016

Here's what you need to know about the 7 Clinton emails ...

Last edited Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:53 PM - Edit history (1)

...which the State Department is withholding due to classification issues.

1) There was no government rule which prevented Hillary from setting up and using a private email server to handle her government emails.

2) Other State Departments heads including Colon Powell used the exact same set up. I don't hear the Republicans complaining about him.

3) Hillary's server was used to send and receive messages to and from other government employees in the State Department and for her personal email traffic as well.

4) Any official State Department emails set to or received from Hillary's server were also maintained the State Department's government servers - therefore there is a government record of each and every one.

5) Investigations determined that Hillary's server had the exact same security protections required on all State Department government servers.

6) Investigation have also concluded that that there was no security breaches of Hillary's server - yes IT security experts can determine if such a breach occurred.

7) Because an email server is most vulnerable to security breaches cause by user error - such as opening a document on a fake email which releases a virus which allows 0the server to be hacked - the less people having access to a server, the more secure it is. So Hillary's server was probably more secure than the State Department's email machines. (Note: There have been several reports of government servers being hacked and very sensitive data being lost. This did not happen on Hillary's server.)

7) The 7 emails in question were not classified when they were sent and received.

8) The State Department is not withholding the 7 emails because they believe they that the emails should be classified; it is another government agency that is claiming that they should be classified. It is a well known fact that there is a propensity in many government agencies to over classify data - often because the information in question may make the the agency look bad if it was ever publicized. It is their way of making sure that the public never knows that they screwed up. I am not saying that is what is going on here, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised me if it were the case because that is often a prime reason why different agencies disagree on information classification.

9) The State Department is not saying that they will never distribute the emails. They are saying that they are withholding them for now until they can do their own investigation as to whether the emails should be classified.

Bottom line: The entire affair was totally blown totally out of proportion by Republican seeking political advantage. If Democrats are repeating Republicans talking points on this issue, they should be ashamed of themselves.

And yes, I am an IT professional who knows what he is talking about when it comes to cyber security.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's what you need to know about the 7 Clinton emails ... (Original Post) CajunBlazer Jan 2016 OP
Thank you! Suich Jan 2016 #1
So that's 9 reasons for republicans Turbineguy Jan 2016 #2
They only need one: Clinton. BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #17
Thanks! nt romana Jan 2016 #3
What I want to know is... lanlady Jan 2016 #4
I'm not sure because I don't know the State Department's secrity setup, but... CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #10
This was supposed to be about Benghazi emails. yallerdawg Jan 2016 #5
And a failed land deal led to a sex scandal. Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #13
Mahalo CajunBlazer! Cha Jan 2016 #6
You're most welcome Cha! CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #8
Thanks CajunBlazer! mcar Jan 2016 #7
You're welcom mcar! CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #9
Yes! fleabiscuit Jan 2016 #11
Excellent, thanks! William769 Jan 2016 #12
Big time K&R. Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #14
I have been leaving some people out - thanks to all for their comments CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #15
Thanks for sticking it out. Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #16

lanlady

(7,135 posts)
4. What I want to know is...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jan 2016

... how is it possible to forward email from a classified system to someone's private email server? I work on classified systems so I know that it's next to impossible to directly send anything classified to an address outside the system. Basically you'd have to sneak it out of the building and scan it. Which makes me believe that unless the State Department is irredeemably stupid when it comes to protecting classified info, whatever went to Hillary's server came from an unclassified network. Do you agree, CajunBlazer?

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
10. I'm not sure because I don't know the State Department's secrity setup, but...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:38 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:25 PM - Edit history (1)

I work in a company were the protection of some of our our customers' date a absolutely paramount. However, I still can send emails (which can be monitored by the company security) to non-company private email addresses. Privileged customer data is kept on secure systems which only those with a need to know can access. I guess one could improperly include such data in an email, but the responsibility for keeping that data secure is the responsibility of those who have access to it. No security software can readily identify that data as customer propriety.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
5. This was supposed to be about Benghazi emails.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 06:46 PM
Jan 2016

Nothing there.

Now the silliness of 'anonymous sources.'

With the goal of discrediting the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

The Republicans said this is what it was all about. Which is good enough for who?

Bleacher Creature

(11,257 posts)
13. And a failed land deal led to a sex scandal.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:57 PM
Jan 2016

This is what they've been throwing at the Clintons since the 90s.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
11. Yes!
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:04 PM
Jan 2016

Holy ratfuck I keep having deja vu all over again moments with those nasty republictard fuckfaced slimy bastards. grrrrr

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
15. I have been leaving some people out - thanks to all for their comments
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jan 2016

It's been a rough two days for me on DU and your comments really help.

Bleacher Creature

(11,257 posts)
16. Thanks for sticking it out.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 12:04 AM
Jan 2016

The whole thing caught my attention when I was about to respond to your post in the HC group - at least until it was locked. It really bothered me to see them follow you here. Glad you're back.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Here's what you need to k...