Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumenid602
(8,620 posts)Why should she be. Iowa was Taylor made for Bernie. She worked her butt off. He should have taken Iowa by a large margin to offset future losses. He may win NH, but she may well be encroaching even on that. Then it's all downhill for the 'revolution.'
And she won't be a sore winner either!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)to fight the republicans in the GE!
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)Stuckinthebush
(10,845 posts)Is that bad?
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)It's too bad we don't have any good examples of what a sore loser looks like.
Anyone have any suggestions for where to look?
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)As of today, SIX days after the caucus?
Sorry, I don't do sarcasm well on DU.
😉
William769
(55,147 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)It really sucks that it's gotten this bad.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)If you're in it for yourself and lose, then yes, there's a great deal of sore-loserism that'll follow.
Hillary has already proven she's NO sore loser. When she was defeated by a savvier junior Senator from Illinois, she conceded with poise and grace, and then she went on to campaign for him, asking her supporters to support him. Then she said "yes" when he asked her to join his Administration and did a fine job as SoS.
?w=810&h=698
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's always good to compare and contrast our candidate with all the others.