Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:04 AM Feb 2016

One small problem with Bernie's healthcare plan



This is a Harvoni tablet. It cures Hep C, if you take 84 of them over 12 weeks.

They cost $1125 each. That's not a misprint: over a thousand dollars for one pill.

Insurance companies are routinely denying coverage for this drug, and a lot of other high-cost treatments. They can't afford it.

Now...if Bernie's plan is going to cover things like thousand-dollar-per-dose pharmaceuticals that you take for twelve weeks in a row, the $3 trillion the current healthcare regime costs the US will look like a drop in the bucket.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hekate

(90,788 posts)
1. The problem with the pharmaceutical companies desperately needs to be fixed. It's obscene.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 04:55 AM
Feb 2016

I don't think Bernie's "plan" will do anything to cut those costs, and I honestly don't know what anyone can do without the Congress behind them passing meaningful laws.

Of all the things that great bully-boy Trump has tossed out, his statement that he would negotiate strongly with (I think he actually said "negotiate the hell out of&quot pharmaceutical companies to bring the cost to consumers down, struck me as something this jerk would be capable of doing. Maybe. But he certainly speaks to people's anger about that.

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
2. Harvoni's biggest cost driver is the R&D cost
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:08 AM
Feb 2016

Which is the problem with a LOT of drugs. Producing the shit isn't all that expensive, but figuring out how to is outrageous. This is how the Canadians get away with charging lower prices for pharmaceuticals - the Canadian government doesn't allow US R&D costs to be added into the price of the meds sold up there.

brer cat

(24,601 posts)
7. I don't know anything about this particular drug,
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:41 AM
Feb 2016

but it is well established that pharma grossly over estimates the R&D that they pay for. Government and universities pay for a huge amount of the basic research.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. Very expensive but from experience there are lots of
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 05:35 AM
Feb 2016

Treatments more expensive. On this one the alternative treatment is more expensive so it does not make sense to go with the higher cost.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
4. And a course of treatment, 84 pills, in India for the same medicine is $900
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:04 AM
Feb 2016

So it's not objectively, immutably, $1125 per pill. One of the things that needs to change is the attitude that there is no other way to exist except as helpless hostages of the pharmaceutical industry.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
9. Indian patent laws don't allow a drug to be patented
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 10:50 AM
Feb 2016

only the process of how it was made is patented.

So if someone figures out how to make the same molecule in a different way, the drug can be copied and marketed in India and third world countries.

It is unfair because most of the cost of a drug goes into identifying hundreds of molecules, finding one that works and then proving that it works.

mucifer

(23,565 posts)
5. Another issue is end of life care. In the USA we
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 08:48 AM
Feb 2016

allow family to make a lot of decisions that are not allowed in many single payor countries. The doctors can tell families there is no hope and not put so many people on ventilators in the ICU in their final days when all of the patients organs are failing from the disease.

I think it's out of control here and I don't know how we can reign it in.

Sarah Palin made a mess out destroying the part of the ACA that had more end of life discussions with the MDs.

I am voting for Bernie because he pushes the issues further to the left. Maybe if we get more democrats in congress the ACA could be tweaked more to benefit the public. I don't expect single payer. But, pushing the issues more towards the left is important in my opinion.

mucifer

(23,565 posts)
8. Thanks for the link. Sarah Palin did some real damage with her
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:50 AM
Feb 2016

"death panel" statements now end of life care planning cannot be billed from the ACA as they had originally wanted.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
11. More disturbing information for health consumers.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

“Drug Shortages
Forcing Hard Decisions on Rationing Treatments

Such shortages are the new normal in American medicine. But the rationing that results has been largely hidden from patients and the public.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/29/us/drug-shortages-forcing-hard-decisions-on-rationing-treatments.html?WT.mc_id=2016-FEBRUARY-FB-MC4-AUD_DEV-0201-0229&WT.mc_ev=click&ad-keywords=AUDDEVREMARK&_r=1

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
12. Yes. This is only one example.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 09:25 PM
Feb 2016

He can not get his plan done. No one knows that better than Hilary except maybe Barack Obama.

uponit7771

(90,363 posts)
13. Sanders plan doesn't outline how he's going to MAKE.. MAKE Doctors, Hospitals and Pharma accept
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:39 AM
Feb 2016

... nearly half of what they get paid today.

His plan makes mention of collective bargaining, I don't think they'll give a shit about all of that ...

Private HCI accounts for 200 billion of the 1.7 trillion yearly HC cost... the rest are the 3 aforementioned groups.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»One small problem with Be...