Hillary Clinton

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts) Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:29 PM Feb 2016

pssst, About Hillary talking to That Man

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

pssst, About Hillary talking to That Man (Original Post) Rose Siding Feb 2016 OP

Oh My! Look at all the "war mongers!" LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #1

except for Oprah--the are diplomates. Doing what is necessary to maintain peace and the goodwill riversedge Feb 2016 #2

Civility towards one's political adversaries is necessary in society. No Vested Interest Feb 2016 #3

In fact, it's the only way to make progress in our American political system Rose Siding Feb 2016 #4

Yeah shenmue Feb 2016 #5

I would to know the jury results on this one.... stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #6

How it is... yallerdawg Feb 2016 #7

Ha-ha! Nailed it! pandr32 Feb 2016 #13

KnR Hekate Feb 2016 #8

You know... kjones Feb 2016 #9

Maybe the revolution will follow the Sandinistas actions. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #10

hilarous, wonderful great post ') mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #11

K&R fleabiscuit Feb 2016 #12

Excellent Rose.. BS is desperate to bring up Kissinger. Cha Feb 2016 #14

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)

1. Oh My! Look at all the "war mongers!"

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:43 PM

Feb 2016

riversedge

(70,242 posts)

2. except for Oprah--the are diplomates. Doing what is necessary to maintain peace and the goodwill

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:44 PM

Feb 2016

of our allies. In that respect--Oprah is an ambassador of US good will.

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)

3. Civility towards one's political adversaries is necessary in society.

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:47 PM

Feb 2016

These photos document interaction between public figures of differing views.
I commend those whose better instincts win out when they meet their ideological opposites.

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)

4. In fact, it's the only way to make progress in our American political system

Reply to No Vested Interest (Reply #3)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:55 PM

Feb 2016

WJC tells about HRC running to him and excitedly relating that she found the human part of Tom DeLay (she's better than me!) That was concerning foster kids.

...So why did she do it? Because Hillary believed it was the right thing to do....

Together, they held events at the White House to raise awareness, and built support for legislation that would encourage adoptions, provide more aid for foster families, and help foster children find permanent, safe, loving homes.

The first piece of legislation was the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, which provided support and services for adoptive families, and increased foster adoptions by 64 percent by 2002.

It's no wonder the Washington Post called the law "the most significant change in federal child-protection policy in almost two decades."

The second piece of legislation, the Foster Care Independence Act of 1999, was focused on children who "age out" of the foster care system when they turn 18.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1107&pid=46910

shenmue

(38,506 posts)

5. Yeah

Reply to No Vested Interest (Reply #3)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:57 PM

Feb 2016

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)

6. I would to know the jury results on this one....

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:57 PM

Feb 2016

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

7. How it is...

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 04:12 PM

Feb 2016

when you are "a party of one."

Claim to fame: Senator Sanders (I-VT)*

pandr32

(11,588 posts)

13. Ha-ha! Nailed it!

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 14, 2016, 12:55 PM

Feb 2016

Hekate

(90,714 posts)

8. KnR

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 04:28 PM

Feb 2016

kjones

(1,053 posts)

9. You know...

Reply to Rose Siding (Original post)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 05:12 PM

Feb 2016

with the rate Sanders and his Twitter Brigade are decrying people as
"1%er sellouts," "oligarchs," and all the other buzzwords....
well, I think at this point, there are more "1%ers" under the bus than
be logical from the statistics of .01

According to Sanders and his supporters, the percentage of Americans
who are 1%ers is like...well, some double digit percent.

Combined with some of Bernie's plans, their definitions of "tie" and their
poor accounting of delegates/voters/(non)endorsements...I'm left with
the conclusion that their camp is just really bad at math.