Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumIs it possible that Bernie will only win Vermont on Tuesday?
I can't think of any Super Tuesday state in which he has polled ahead of Hillary, at least on anything like a consistent basis. He's slightly behind in Oklahoma and Massachusetts, and while Colorado and Minnesota are still in the black box, earlier polls always showed Hillary comfortably ahead. I personally would be happy to hold Bernie to three states on Tuesday - Vermont, one of the close runners, and one of the caucus states - but could it be that we can hold him to one?
11 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Time expired | |
Bernie will win one state on Tuesday. | |
5 (45%) |
|
Bernie will win two states on Tuesday. | |
5 (45%) |
|
Bernie will win three states on Tuesday. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Bernie will win four states on Tuesday. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Bernie will win five states on Tuesday. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Bernie will win six or more states on Tuesday. | |
1 (9%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)And that is all i've got for Tuesday.
msongs
(67,462 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Response to Chichiri (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)CO and MN are nerve wracking with no polling info!
Treant
(1,968 posts)said he'd win 6+ states? I owe you a beer...you owe me a keyboard since I just spit Coke on mine.
Response to Treant (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Treant
(1,968 posts)Reality is not their strong point.
On the up side, Paddypower's revision tonight now has Clinton at 1:14 to win (so you can bet $14 and win $15). Sanders, 7:1 (bet $1, win $8).
Most predictive sites are crawling into the 95% Clinton win range.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)jmowreader
(50,567 posts)Vermont, no question, and we're certain to hear about the "momentum" and the "inevitability of his winning the primaries" he'll get by a "decisive victory" in his own state.
Mass has WAY too many people who would feel significant pain under a Sanders regime to just hand the commonwealth (if you want a grade-A, Skittles-quality ass kicking, accuse Mass of being a state) over to him. There are twelve Fortune 500 corporations in Mass - the state is thick with insurance companies, banks, medical device manufacturers and defense contractors who would all be significantly fucked under a Sanders regime. But I'll be generous and give him a one-in-five chance of winning that primary.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Maybe Mass (regardless of the whole Boston and industry issue). Possibly OK. But not both.
6chars
(3,967 posts)Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,495 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)He's certainly all in in Colorado... he's spent over 1MM in advertising there. Mass will be close.
otohara
(24,135 posts)and they are fired-up ready to Bern.
I recruited 5 neighbors to come to caucus and we're with HER!
Traffic now sucks in Denver - eeek
George II
(67,782 posts)Alabama 99
Arkansas 99
Colorado ?
Georgia 99
Massachusetts 81
Minnesota ?
Oklahoma 77
Tennessee 98
Texas 99
Vermont <0
Virginia 99
Vermont is the only loss so far. Clinton is ahead in the polls in Colorado and Minnesota.