What is with the attacks? If I said what you deserve I'd get alerted.

Just like yours.

Will you vote for Bernie if he wins it?

I just had to ask

Mr. Sanders and Mrs. Clinton have BOTH refrained from making personal attacks. What they do is laying out political positions and policies they hope to implement.

These elections are about politics. Not about Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Sanders. Not about their supporters. It's about their positions. And since quite a few of those positions overlap, we need to select a good candidate, without acrimony, to carry those policies forward, into a new presidency.

FYI

I have yet to see any one Hillary supporter who says they will not support whomever is the Dem Nominee.

As for the Sanders supporters....you cannot claim the same. just peek through this thread..over and over, Bernie supporters claiming they would not vote for hillary should she get the Dem Nomination: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6794324

Since you asked, I thought I'd tell.

would you expect them to after supporting Senator Sanders (I-VT) who is a confirmed DINO?

They have already made the leap away from the Party.

I lean a little more toward Berine's agenda.

.......about those Bernie supporters who refuse to to vote for the Dem Nominee should it be Hillary?

can't see how they would want, or be responsible for any clown being pres.

this sort of thing is not what protected groups are for.

of this group:

"Discuss the life, career, and accomplishments of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Supporters only."

Is that supporting Hillary's life, career, and accomplishments?

It had to do with someone using this room inappropriately. It shouldn't be done here or in any other candidates room.

for you to post here.

And, it has nothing to do with the fact that a candidate's room was used to attack to others on DU, instead of using it for it's stated mission.

I don't why you're so angry.

The point is the hosts of this room decide what is appropriate in this room.

The point is we don't need Sanders supporters coming in here to police us.

I don't do it to the Sanders room i would appreciate you not doing it in here.

This thread is in latest threads which is open to the public.

When a post is posted in this room you will see the title of the thread and above that the room it is in when looking in the latest thread page.

Why not just keep private groups out of latest threads so that you don't have DUers not in the group making comments. If you want an exclusive group, why not keep it out of areas that the nonmembers go? It would be good for the group and the nonmembers because I've noticed on many occasions that the members of a group get upset if one of the non members says something not acceptable to the group. I think the exclusive groups set up non members to fail by coming into public areas.

It is the responsibility of a DUer to notice the group you post in.

What does this mean?

This room is for supporters only. The sop is in the link below.

http://election.democraticunderground.com/?com=about&forum=1107

Firstly, why do so many other have no problem with it?
Second, every other group appears on the latest page...

and finally if you were observant, you can could what appears on YOUR latest page. I think you just want to complain, however.

Here are my settings:

[url=http://www.servimg.com/view/11715825/1524][img][/img][/url]

For those that had no idea that they could not be negative in a certain group. Yes so I am complaining.

change your setting.

Oh by the way, you latest in GD will be locked shortly as META

Knowledge is key I thought. I came to the board with a problem and instead of addressing it we'll get rid of it so that the misunderstandings can continue. Got it.

I actually was trying to tell you what to do to solve your problem, but for some reason.....

I'll end there.

issues.

I am still learning and thank you for the help.

not sure if i will vote for her, but admire her incredible achievements, and think she would make a fine pres.
i like bernie too. very happy to have 2 such great dems.

not sure if you are insinuating that i shouldnt be posting here. but i dont see how trashing bernie supporters has anything to do with the purpose of the group.

On Mon Jun 8, 2015, 06:28 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Hillary beats out Bernie in Wisconsin and Bernie people are jumping for joy!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11078595

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Take this ad hominem nasty post to Hillary Mojo , hidden away for the devotees. This has no business anywhere on DU.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 8, 2015, 06:32 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a safe haven so I'll let them vent. It must suck to be supporting someone you think is the anointed one and then have another candidate pull close and make it look like it may be a race. And the poster should probably realize that if they are going to call people "mean" they may want to tone down the "delusional" talk. And maybe look for the plank in your own eye and all that.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Name calling, flame bait, intended purely to disrupt. Hide.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If personal attacks can remain then this type of post should stay in view also.

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ugly and hateful. This is a sick post
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

impression that a groups Admins, not the general DU forum determine if a post fits the criteria of a group, not the DU jury system. Can someone clarify that for me if they know

Also, reading some of the comments from the jury on this reinforces why I do not take part in the process. It has no real standards, and some jury participants find a need to make their own personal remarks regarding the conflict, and worse, sometimes inject that bias into their decision

Groups are supposed to be a sanctuary for supporters I thought

Hosts of a group get to decide only on OPs (if they meet the SOP) and if DU members are blocked from the group.

Anybody on DU can alert on any post in any group in DU and then the jury takes over. As was the case here.

I'm probably one of the comments you weren't happy about (though I voted to leave) and I'm fine with that.

The real story is that this straw poll only shows how much stronger Clinton is than eight years ago, when in the same poll:

Of the 389 delegates, alternates and guests who voted in 2008, 153 backed Edwards, while Hillary Clinton came in second with 83 votes and Barack Obama was third with 74.

The progressive insurgent is again sitting with ~40% of the vote, but now Clinton has closer to 50% than 20% support. The left wing activists in the party are significantly less hostile towards her than they were back then.

Also Clinton only got 55% in their poll last year essentially unopposed so it's clearly not representative of national polling of Democrats. Sanders may consolidate the "Anyone But Hillary" bloc, but unlike in 2007/8 that's now only a minority of the party.