Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumClinton co-sponsored legislation in 2001 & 2002 to expand stem cell research-Sanders evolved
TWEET:
Clinton co-sponsored legislation in 2001 & 2002 that would have expanded stem cell research-Sanders has evolved http://apne.ws/1SIgvLO #p2
Clinton, Sanders had opposing views on biomedical research
By KEN THOMAS
Apr. 2, 2016 12:35 PM EDT
0
2 photos
FILE - In this April 1, 2016 file photo, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks... Read more
NEW YORK (AP) Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders were on opposing sides of certain types of biomedical research while they served in Congress, differences that have gained notice by scientists and advocates on the forefront of stem cell research.
Clinton has pointed to her advocacy for groundbreaking medical research, from her push for more dollars as a New York senator for the National Institutes of Health to her long support for stem cell research that could eventually lead to regenerative medicine.
Sanders, a Vermont senator, has supported stem cell research in the Senate. But advocates within the scientific community cite his voting record in the early 2000s in the House when he repeatedly supported a ban on all forms of human cloning, including one called therapeutic cloning intended to create customized cells to treat disease....................
.............Some advocates for stem cell research said that overlooked the potential benefits of finding possible cures to Alzheimer's, Lou Gehrig's and other fatal or disabling diseases.
"Sanders and (then Republican House Majority Leader Tom) DeLay some unlikely group were just unyielding and they were part of the religious right's attempt to shut down this whole critical new frontier of therapy for chronic disease," said Robert Klein, chairman of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine.................
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sheshe2
(83,846 posts)Got it, he was more concerned with the profits the companies would make and not the people that were dying from these diseases. The ones whose lives might have been saved through research. My dad died a year and a half ago from Alzheimer, a long decent into blackness. It killed him and it broke our hearts watching him slip away never knowing who we were.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)Sticking it to the corporations than he does about the unknown folks affected, re: his tarp funds vote. Unless it's the gun lobby that is.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,136 posts)How progressive of him.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Scientific research will surely result in some people making money as ideas are developed and put into practice. Why is that a bad thing if people are being helped and lives saved?
Or T. Boone Pickens, who comes up with some halfway decent ideas for an energy policy, but a good many folks on the left won't hear of it because he might actually make some money from it.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)Simple as that.
Hekate
(90,769 posts)Human suffering is in a sense abstract, and with his focus on One Simple Answer to Everything, he smply does not see the real world human consequences of it.
sheshe2
(83,846 posts)Nothing else matters to him.
Several posts here tonight. They hurt me.
Hekate
(90,769 posts)You are the best!
I gotta go~
pandr32
(11,601 posts)I have often puzzled over his apparent lack of real empathy. He is a strange one.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Figures.
And he calls that RW Oklahoma shithead Jim Inhofe is his bff.
And he voted with the RW AGAINST THE AMBER ALERT of all things.
What's there to like about bernie again?
Barf
sheshe2
(83,846 posts)+1000
Hugs Mister!
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Good morning to you
Cha
(297,503 posts)Thank you, rivers
sheshe2
(83,846 posts)BMUS is all over that thread.
Cha
(297,503 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)sheshe2
(83,846 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)riversedge
(70,271 posts)really do not read anything. For many of them--they exist on this board only to demean Hillary.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)He's lied.